Archive of ietf-822/old-archive1, by thread

Go to date index
Go to main page for ietf-822/old-archive1

Page 6 of 8
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

Different approach to defining encodings, David Robinson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Different approach to defining encodings, david
  - Re: Different approach to defining encodings, Timo Lehtinen
    - Re: Different approach to defining encodings, Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: Different approach to defining encodings, Neil Katin
  - Re: Different approach to defining encodings, Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: Different approach to defining encodings, David Robinson
Is ? a distinguished character in UUCP mail?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Is ? a distinguished character in UUCP mail?, Ned Freed, Postmaster
Audio redux, Nathaniel Borenstein
New Audio Stuff, Nathaniel Borenstein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: New Audio Stuff, david
Metamail release, Nathaniel Borenstein
Security Issues, Randall Atkinson
Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript consideredharmful), Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript considered harmful), Keith Moore
  - Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript considered harmful), Bill Janssen
    - Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript considered harmful), Louis A. Mamakos
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript consideredharmful), Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript consideredharmful), Ned Freed, Postmaster
filename= headers in mail, emv
Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript considered harmful), Neil Katin
checksums, James M Galvin
- Re: checksums, Keith Moore
  - Re: checksums, James M Galvin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: checksums, Ned Freed, Postmaster
  - Re: checksums, James M Galvin
- Re: checksums, James M Galvin
- Re: checksums, Neil Katin
trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript considered harmful), Keith Moore
- Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript considered harmful), Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript considered harmful), Nathaniel Borenstein
  - Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript considered harmful), Bill Janssen
    - Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript considered harmful), Nathaniel Borenstein
    - RFC XXXX Security issues WAS: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail, Greg Vaudreuil
    - Re: RFC XXXX Security issues WAS: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail, James M Galvin
    - Re: RFC XXXX Security issues WAS: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail, Dave Crocker
    - Re: RFC XXXX Security issues WAS: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - re: RFC XXXX Security issues WAS: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail, Mark Crispin
    - Re: trojan horses in RFC XXXX mail (tex/troff/postscript considered harmful), Bill Janssen
base64 and checksums, Marshall Rose
- Re: base64 and checksums, Keith Moore
- Re: base64 and checksums, henry
  - Re: base64 and checksums, James M Galvin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: base64 and checksums, Ned Freed, Postmaster
  - Re: base64 and checksums, Marshall Rose
    - Re: base64 and checksums, Keith Moore
    - Re: base64 and checksums, Marshall Rose
- Re: base64 and checksums, Ned Freed, Postmaster
  - Re: base64 and checksums, Marshall Rose
content-charset and ISO-2022, Neil Katin
- Re: content-charset and ISO-2022, Nathaniel Borenstein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: content-charset and ISO-2022, Keld J|rn Simonsen
UTF misunderstanding, David Robinson
Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX (really multipart/archive), Guido van Rossum
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX (really multipart/archive), Neil Katin
Mark's recent notes .., david
- Re: Mark's recent notes .., Nathaniel Borenstein
AUDIO silences, Klensin
- Re: AUDIO silences, Bob Smart
- Re: AUDIO silences, Nathaniel Borenstein
  - Re: AUDIO silences, Bill Janssen
Re: encodings, base-64, etc., Ned Freed, Postmaster
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: encodings, base-64, etc., david
checksums in RFC XXXX, James M Galvin
- Re: checksums in RFC XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein
agreement on checksum & features, Randall Atkinson
several comments on RFC-XXXX, Guido van Rossum
- Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein
  - Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX, Timo Lehtinen
    - Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX, Keith Moore
    - Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX, Guido van Rossum
    - Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX (really multipart/archive), Guido van Rossum
    - Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX (really multipart/archive), Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX (really multipart/archive), Guido van Rossum
    - Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX (really multipart/archive), Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX, Timo Lehtinen
    - Re: several comments on RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein
Re: plain-text checksums considered useless, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: plain-text checksums considered useless, Ned Freed, Postmaster
ISO-2022, Mark Crispin
Re: content-charset & checksums, Randall Atkinson
- Re: content-charset & checksums, Greg Vaudreuil
  - Re: content-charset & checksums, Mark Crispin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: content-charset & checksums, Neil Katin
  - Re: content-charset & checksums, Valdis Kletnieks
- Re: content-charset & checksums, Ned Freed, Postmaster
  - Re: content-charset & checksums, Bob Smart
- Re: content-charset & checksums, Neil Katin
  - Re: content-charset & checksums, James M Galvin
  - Re: content-charset & checksums, Mark Crispin
  - Re: content-charset & checksums, Keith Moore
- Re: content-charset & checksums, Eliot Lear
- Re: content-charset & checksums, Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: content-charset & checksums, Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: content-charset & checksums, Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: content-charset & checksums, Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: content-charset & checksums, Ned Freed, Postmaster
mnemonic, Keld J|rn Simonsen
AUDIO, anyone?, Nathaniel Borenstein
Agenda of Santa Fe Message Format Extensions WG, Greg Vaudreuil
more content-charset, Mark Crispin
- content-charset & checksums, Nathaniel Borenstein
  - Re: checksums (was: content-charset & checksums), James M Galvin
    - Re: checksums (was: content-charset & checksums), David J. Camp
    - Re: checksums (was: content-charset & checksums), Dave Crocker
  - re: content-charset & checksums, Mark Crispin
    - Re: content-charset & checksums, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: content-charset & checksums, Mark Crispin
    - Re: checksums, James M Galvin
    - Re: checksums, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: content-charset & checksums, Greg Vaudreuil
    - Re: content-charset & checksums, Mark Crispin
    - Re: content-charset & checksums, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: content-charset & checksums, Mark Crispin
    - Re: content-charset & checksums, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: content-charset & checksums, Mark Crispin
    - Re: content-charset & checksums, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: content-charset & checksums, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - plain-text checksums considered useless, henry
    - Re: plain-text checksums considered useless, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: plain-text checksums considered useless, Erik E. Fair" (Your Friendly Postmaster)
- more content-charset, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  - Re: more content-charset, Nathaniel Borenstein
developments with 10646, KLENSIN
- <Possible follow-ups>
- developments with 10646, KLENSIN
- Re: developments with 10646, Johnny Eriksson
- Re: developments with 10646, Keld J|rn Simonsen
- developments with 10646, KLENSIN
- developments with 10646, KLENSIN
speaking now..., KLENSIN
- <Possible follow-ups>
- speaking now..., KLENSIN
SPEAK NOW OR FOREVER HOLD YOUR PEACE, Bob Smart
Multi-level content-types, david
- Re: Multi-level content-types, Nathaniel Borenstein
Re: Troff preprocessors and macro files, RL "Bob" Morgan
Re: SPEAK NOW OR HOLD YOUR PEACE (Was Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers), Keld J|rn Simonsen
- Re: SPEAK NOW OR HOLD YOUR PEACE (Was Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers), Keith Moore
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SPEAK NOW OR HOLD YOUR PEACE (Was Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers), Keld J|rn Simonsen
TABS and arithmetic, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD)
- Re: TABS and arithmetic, Nathaniel Borenstein
My "samples" directory, Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: My "samples" directory, Valdis Kletnieks
  - Re: My "samples" directory, Nathaniel Borenstein
transport-related issues in RFC-XXXX, KLENSIN
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: transport-related issues in RFC-XXXX, John Noerenberg
  - Re: transport-related issues in RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein
  - Re: transport-related issues in RFC-XXXX, Bill Janssen
RFC-XXXX torture test, Mark Crispin
Re: SPEAK NOW OR HOLD YOUR PEACE (Was Re: Yet another proposal fornon-ASCII chars in headers), Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: SPEAK NOW OR HOLD YOUR PEACE (Was Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers), Bob Smart
  - Re: SPEAK NOW OR HOLD YOUR PEACE (Was Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers), Keith Moore
- Re: SPEAK NOW OR HOLD YOUR PEACE (Was Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers), Nathaniel Borenstein
more content-charset stuff, Neil Katin
- re: more content-charset stuff, Mark Crispin
  - Re: more content-charset stuff, Nathaniel Borenstein
  - Re: more content-charset stuff, Dave Crocker
    - Re: more content-charset stuff, Marshall Rose
- <Possible follow-ups>
- re: more content-charset stuff, Keld J|rn Simonsen
  - re: more content-charset stuff, Mark Crispin
- Re: more content-charset stuff, Ned Freed, Postmaster
  - Re: more content-charset stuff, Mark Crispin
- Re: more content-charset stuff, Ned Freed, Postmaster
  - Re: more content-charset stuff, Mark Crispin
SPEAK NOW OR HOLD YOUR PEACE (Was Re: Yet another proposal f, GTL
Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Vincent Lau
- re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Mark Crispin
  - Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Keith Moore
- Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD)
  - Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Keith Moore
    - Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, henry
    - Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - encodings, base-64, etc., henry
    - Re: encodings, base-64, etc., Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: encodings, base-64, etc., Craig_Everhart
    - Re: encodings, base-64, etc., Rudy_Nedved
    - Re: encodings, base-64, etc., Bill Janssen
    - Re: encodings, base-64, etc., Mark Crispin
    - Re: encodings, base-64, etc., Dave Crocker
  - Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Dave Crocker
- Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD)
SAMPLE RFC-XXXX messages, Nathaniel Borenstein
- Samples are fixed, have at 'em, Nathaniel Borenstein
another bad idea of mine, Mark Crispin
- Re: another bad idea of mine, Nathaniel Borenstein
Note on RFC-XXXX, David Herron
comments on October draft, Randall Atkinson
- Re: comments on October draft, Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: comments on October draft, Marshall Rose
  - Re: comments on October draft, Timo Lehtinen
  - Re: comments on October draft, jknowles
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: comments on October draft, henry
- Re: comments on October draft, Marshall Rose
- Re: comments on October draft, henry
  - Re: comments on October draft, Julian Onions
    - Troff preprocessors and macro files (was Re: comments on October draft), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: Troff preprocessors and macro files (was Re: comments on October draft), henry
    - Re: comments on October draft, henry
ISO 2022, MNEMONIC, etc, Erik M. van der Poel
Re: recommended encoding for RFC-XXXX, Randall Atkinson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: recommended encoding for RFC-XXXX, Keld J|rn Simonsen
- Re: recommended encoding for RFC-XXXX, Keld J|rn Simonsen
Status of MH XXXX implementation, Marshall Rose
RFC-XXXX and DIS2 of ISO 10646, Walt Daniels
Universal Code Set (UCS) update, Walt Daniels
ISO-2022 & RFC-XXXX, Randall Atkinson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ISO-2022 & RFC-XXXX, Keld J|rn Simonsen
Audio type, Marshall Rose
- Re: Audio type, Edward Vielmetti
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Audio type, Mitch Kapor
- Re: Audio type, Neil Katin
  - Re: Audio type, Marshall Rose
    - Re: Audio type, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: Audio type, Guido van Rossum
new draft of RFC-XXXX again, Mark Crispin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: new draft of RFC-XXXX again, Ned Freed, Postmaster
more on draft, Mark Crispin
SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Mark Crispin
- Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Marshall Rose
  - Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Mark Crispin
    - Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Marshall Rose
- SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Nathaniel Borenstein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Ned Freed, Postmaster
  - Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Mark Crispin
    - Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Marshall Rose
    - Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Mark Crispin
    - Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Marshall Rose
    - Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Mark Crispin
    - Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Marshall Rose
    - Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Mark Crispin
    - Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Marshall Rose
    - Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Mark Crispin
    - Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Marshall Rose
    - Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Mark Crispin
    - Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Dave Crocker
- Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Keld J|rn Simonsen
- Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Mark Crispin
- Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Marshall Rose
- Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, david
  - Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Marshall Rose
  - Re: SHOW STOPPERS in the new RFC-XXXX draft, Nathaniel Borenstein
Re: X.400 and extra headers (about stripping them), Ned Freed, Postmaster
programming efforts?, Guido van Rossum
- Re: programming efforts?, Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: programming efforts?, Marshall Rose
- Re: programming efforts?, jknowles
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: programming efforts?, Ned Freed, Postmaster
Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Keith Moore
- Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Bob Smart
- Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Nathaniel Borenstein
  - Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Craig_Everhart
    - Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Uhhyung Choi
    - Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Keith Moore
  - Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, John C Klensin
  - Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Dave Crocker
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, John C Klensin
  - Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Keith Moore
- Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Erik M. van der Poel
  - Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - SPEAK NOW OR HOLD YOUR PEACE (Was Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers), Nathaniel Borenstein
Mnemonic header proposal: Japanese problems, separation problems, Bob Smart
[no subject], Gershon M. Kagan
Encoded-Variable scheme, Erik M. van der Poel
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, John C Klensin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Keld J|rn Simonsen
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Erik M. van der Poel
  - Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, John C Klensin
  - Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Erik M. van der Poel
  - Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, John C Klensin
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Ned Freed, Postmaster
  - Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Erik E. Fair" (Your Friendly Postmaster)
  - X.400 and extra headers (about stripping them), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Ned Freed, Postmaster
  - Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Erik E. Fair" (Your Friendly Postmaster)
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Ned Freed, Postmaster
Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Keld J|rn Simonsen
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Mark Crispin
  - Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Bob Smart
    - Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Mark Crispin
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Erik M. van der Poel
  - Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Keld J|rn Simonsen
  - Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Bob Smart
    - Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Mark Crispin
    - Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Bob Smart
    - Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Mark Crispin
    - Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Bob Smart
    - Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Bob Smart
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Keld J|rn Simonsen
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Keld J|rn Simonsen
  - Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Mark Crispin
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Keld J|rn Simonsen
  - Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Mark Crispin
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Keld J|rn Simonsen
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Randall Atkinson
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Randall Atkinson
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Keld J|rn Simonsen
  - Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Mark Crispin
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Randall Atkinson
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Keld J|rn Simonsen
  - Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Mark Crispin
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Keld J|rn Simonsen
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs, Keld J|rn Simonsen
Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Bob Smart
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  - Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Bob Smart
    - Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Bob Smart
    - Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Bob Smart
    - Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, John C Klensin
    - Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Mark Crispin
    - Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Bob Smart
    - Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Mark Crispin
    - Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Bob Smart
- Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Erik M. van der Poel
  - Re: Headers: the universal character set option in detail, Nathaniel Borenstein
new draft of SMTP/DIS10646, Robert Ullmann
Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Nathaniel Borenstein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Randall Atkinson
  - Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Bob Smart
- Re: Non-ASCII hdrs: Encoded-Variables Redux, Keld J|rn Simonsen
Nathaniel gets his name in lights, Neil Katin
NEW VERSION of RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: NEW VERSION of RFC-XXXX, henry
NEW proposal on encoded-headers, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- re: NEW proposal on encoded-headers, Mark Crispin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NEW proposal on encoded-headers, Erik M. van der Poel
2 points for rfc-xxxx, Bob Smart
- Re: 2 points for rfc-xxxx, Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: 2 points for rfc-xxxx, henry
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 2 points for rfc-xxxx, KLENSIN
Basic requirements of a message, Dan Oscarsson
- re: Basic requirements of a message, Mark Crispin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- re: Basic requirements of a message, Dan Oscarsson
  - re: Basic requirements of a message, Mark Crispin
    - Re: Basic requirements of a message, Dave Crocker
  - Re: Basic requirements of a message, Sven-Ove Westberg
- Re: Basic requirements of a message, Johnny Eriksson
  - Re: Basic requirements of a message, Sven-Ove Westberg
  - Re: Basic requirements of a message, Nathaniel Borenstein
  - Re: Basic requirements of a message, Mark Crispin
- Re: Basic requirements of a message, Keld J|rn Simonsen
- Re: Basic requirements of a message, KLENSIN
- Re: Basic requirements of a message, Keld J|rn Simonsen
NETF and non-ASCII headers, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: NETF and non-ASCII headers, guido
  - Re: NETF and non-ASCII headers, jwagner
    - Re: NETF and non-ASCII headers, Nathaniel Borenstein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NETF and non-ASCII headers, Andy Hooper
- Re: NETF and non-ASCII headers, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD)
Unsubscribe, Anders Johansson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Unsubscribe, grants
- Unsubscribe, Theresa Chen
- Unsubscribe, ayers
  - Unsubscribe, Marc Andreessen
- UNSUBSCRIBE, Timo Lehtinen
- unsubscribe, Katsunori Suzuki
header encodings, Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: header encodings, John C Klensin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: header encodings, Keld J|rn Simonsen
- Re: header encodings, Erik M. van der Poel
The KTH-proposal of a solution to the header-problem, Patrik F{ltstr|m
- Re: The KTH-proposal of a solution to the header-problem, John C Klensin
  - Re: The KTH-proposal of a solution to the header-problem, Peter Svanberg
  - Re: The KTH-proposal of a solution to the header-problem, Dave Crocker
- Re: The KTH-proposal of a solution to the header-problem, Dave Crocker
  - THE CHAIR RESPONDS Was: The KTH-proposal, Greg Vaudreuil
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The KTH-proposal of a solution to the header-problem, Keld J|rn Simonsen
multiple types in Content-Type, Bill Janssen
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: multiple types in Content-Type, Jim Knowles
  - Re: multiple types in Content-Type, Bill Janssen
multiple languages in the headers, Neil Katin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: multiple languages in the headers, Ned Freed, Postmaster
RichText, Olle Jarnefors
- Re: RichText, Nathaniel Borenstein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Richtext, Klensin
  - Re: Richtext, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Richtext, Erik Naggum
    - Re: Richtext, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: Richtext, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: Richtext, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: Richtext, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: Richtext, Erik Naggum
    - Re: Richtext, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Nested comments, the sequel, Erik Naggum
    - Re: Nested comments, the sequel, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: Richtext, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Richtext, Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: Richtext, Erik M. van der Poel
  - Re: Richtext, Mark Crispin
    - Re: Richtext, Bill Janssen
    - Re: Richtext, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: Richtext, Erik Naggum
    - Re: Richtext, Jacob Palme SKHB
    - Re: Richtext, Dave Crocker
    - Special text rendering, Jacob Palme SKHB
    - Re: Richtext, henry
    - Re: Richtext -- a simpler format, Bill Janssen
  - Re: Richtext, Nathaniel Borenstein
    - Re: Richtext, David Herron
- Re: Richtext, Klensin
- Re: Richtext, Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: Richtext, Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: Richtext, Keld J|rn Simonsen
- richtext, Luc Rooijakkers
- Re: richtext, rhys
  - Re: richtext, lwj
- Re: richtext, rhys
Unsubscribe me, Duane Kimball
Broken mailer somewhere, Richard Foulk
Re: Mnemonic & Asian languages, atkinson
- Re: Mnemonic & Asian languages, Bob Smart
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Mnemonic & Asian languages, Keld J|rn Simonsen
Re: Encapsulation boundary algorithms, James H. Thompson - HNL
mnemonics for Japanese, Erik M. van der Poel
SMTP/8 and 822/8 further discussion..., David Robinson
non-ASCII in headers, John C Klensin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: non-ASCII in headers, Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: non-ASCII in headers, Neil Katin
  - Re: non-ASCII in headers, Mark Crispin
- Re: non-ASCII in headers, Neil Katin
- Re: non-ASCII in headers, Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: non-ASCII in headers, Keld J|rn Simonsen
- Re: non-ASCII in headers, Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: non-ASCII in headers, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD)
  - Re: non-ASCII in headers, John C Klensin
  - Re: non-ASCII in headers, Mark Crispin
    - Re: non-ASCII in headers, feldmark
    - Re: non-ASCII in headers, Mark Crispin
    - Re: non-ASCII in headers, feldmark
- Re: non-ASCII in headers, leo j mclaughlin iii
  - Re: non-ASCII in headers, Mark Crispin
- Re: non-ASCII in headers, leo j mclaughlin iii
- Re: non-ASCII in headers, Neil Katin
- Re: non-ASCII in headers, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD)
  - Re: non-ASCII in headers, Nathaniel Borenstein
  - Re: non-ASCII in headers, Dave Crocker
  - Re: non-ASCII in headers, henry
    - Re: non-ASCII in headers, John C Klensin
- Re: non-ASCII in headers, leo j mclaughlin iii
- Re: non-ASCII in headers, Ned Freed, Postmaster
[no subject], 0000-Admin(0000
Re: Why current RFC-XXXX is unsuitable for non-English languages (Re:Let us finish RFC-XXXX NOW!), Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: Why current RFC-XXXX is unsuitable for non-English languages (Re: Let us finish RFC-XXXX NOW!), Patrik F{ltstr|m
Returned mail: User unknown, Mail Delivery Subsystem
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Returned mail: User unknown, Mail Delivery Subsystem
- Returned mail: User unknown, Mail Delivery Subsystem
- Returned mail: User unknown, Mail Delivery Subsystem
- Returned mail: User unknown, Mail Delivery Subsystem
- Returned mail: User unknown, Mail Delivery Subsystem
- Returned mail: User unknown, Mail Delivery Subsystem
Grist for the XXX mill..., Einar Stefferud
- Re: Grist for the XXX mill..., Marshall Rose
Why current RFC-XXXX is unsuitable for non-English languages (Re: Let us finish RFC-XXXX NOW!), Olle Jarnefors
Priorities and why RFC-XXXX don't have to be delayed (Re: Let us finish RFC-XXXX NOW!), Olle Jarnefors
Must the rest of us email "under private agreement"? (Re: What we're trying to achieve), Olle Jarnefors
A simple extension of the machinery already there (Re: Let us finish RFC-XXXX NOW!), Olle Jarnefors
SMTP/8 and 822/8 ... Questions and Answers (cont. 1), David Robinson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SMTP/8 and 822/8 ... Questions and Answers (cont. 1), Ned Freed, Postmaster
8-bit 822 and Prime, John C Klensin
ANOTHER POINT OF ORDER, Greg Vaudreuil
- Re: ANOTHER POINT OF ORDER, Dave Crocker
8-bit SMTP and 8-bit 822... Questions and Answers, David Robinson
- re: 8-bit SMTP and 8-bit 822... Questions and Answers, Mark Crispin
  - Re: 8-bit SMTP and 8-bit 822... Questions and Answers, Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: 8-bit SMTP and 8-bit 822... Questions and Answers, Einar Stefferud
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 8-bit SMTP and 8-bit 822... Questions and Answers, Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: 8-bit SMTP and 8-bit 822... Questions and Answers, Ned Freed, Postmaster
8-bit SMTP and 8-bit 822, David Robinson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 8-bit SMTP and 8-bit 822, Ned Freed, Postmaster
  - Re: 8-bit SMTP and 8-bit 822, Dave Crocker
Some _really_ easy questions, Ryan Waldron
- Re: Some _really_ easy questions, Dave Crocker
  - Re: Some _really_ easy questions, James M Galvin
Question on encapsulation, James H. Thompson - HNL
- Re: Question on encapsulation, Nathaniel Borenstein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Question on encapsulation, Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: Question on encapsulation, James H. Thompson - HNL
- Re: Question on encapsulation, Ned Freed, Postmaster
  - Re: Question on encapsulation, Timo Lehtinen
    - Re: Question on encapsulation, Craig_Everhart
    - Re: Question on encapsulation, Timo Lehtinen

Page 6 of 8
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.