[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ambiguity on 8859-* and bi-directionality

To: keld@xxxxxxxx (Keld J|rn Simonsen)
Subject: Re: Ambiguity on 8859-* and bi-directionality
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 94 11:33:49 JST
Cc: moore@xxxxxxxxxx, Harald.T.Alvestrand@xxxxxxxxxx, nsb@xxxxxxxxxx, ietf-822@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>; from "Keld J|rn Simonsen" at Jul 21, 94 1:54 pm

> Yes, but that is not in contradiction.
> We have decided in the working group on the charsets standardized
> for MIME, that is the ISO 8859-* series, and then we said (at least the
> wg meeting in Santa Fe, as far as I remember) that we would refer to the
> IANA registered charsets with these registered values (the iso-8859-*
> names) as coming from rfc1345.

Specification of ISO-8859-* in RFC 1345 includes ESC, SI and SO.
So, it is no good.

						Masataka Ohta

References:
- Re: Ambiguity on 8859-* and bi-directionality
  - From: Keld J|rn Simonsen

Prev by Date: Re: Confirmation
Next by Date: Re: Ambiguity on 8859-* and bi-directionality
Previous by thread: Re: Ambiguity on 8859-* and bi-directionality
Next by thread: Re: Ambiguity on 8859-* and bi-directionality
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread