Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header

[Ned Freed <NED@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > >    "Content-Disposition is an optional header; In its absence,
> > >    presentation should default to 'inline'."
> >
> >    What is the justification for this?  To me 'attachment'
> >    seems more natural and will fit with many existing viewers.

> I'd rather amend this to say:

>     The Content-Disposition header is optional.  In the absence
>     of a Content-Disposition header, the manner in which the
>     body part should be presented is undefined.

This sounds fine to me.

> Actually, I think it's out-of-scope for the Content-Disposition
> document to define what happens when the header is not present.

Agreed.

				Ned