[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header
> > > "Content-Disposition is an optional header; In its absence,
> > > presentation should default to 'inline'."
> > What is the justification for this? To me 'attachment'
> > seems more natural and will fit with many existing viewers.
> I'd rather amend this to say:
> The Content-Disposition header is optional. In the absence
> of a Content-Disposition header, the manner in which the
> body part should be presented is undefined.
This sounds fine to me.
> Actually, I think it's out-of-scope for the Content-Disposition
> document to define what happens when the header is not present.