Re: How we are planning to embed HTML in messages

[fontaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Alain Fontaine (Post master, UCL))]

A (At) 15:59 15/05/95, Jacob Palme ecrivait (wrote):
>Perhaps such a parameter should be added? I copied the output
>produced by PINE, which has such a parameter. "name" in general
>seems to be a parameter which could be on any kind of body part,
>since any kind of body part can have a disk file as its source!

On the contrary (from the latest draft):

>An additional parameter, "CONVERSIONS", was defined in RFC
>1341 but has since been removed.  RFC 1341 also defined the
>use of a "NAME" parameter which gave a suggested file name to
>be used if the data were to be written to a file.  This has
>been deprecated in anticipation of a separate Content-
>Disposition header field, to be defined in a subsequent RFC.

                                                    /AF