[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: URLs and TLS

To: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: URLs and TLS
From: Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 11:24:30 -0800 (PST)
Cc: Application Use of TLS IETF List <ietf-apps-tls@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-apps-tls@xxxxxxx

On Mon, 9 Mar 1998, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:
> Seems OK to me, but I'd add "none" to the list. This means "TLS is not at
> all required". This may be trivial, but it covers all of the bases so a URL
> emitter can always put the "TLS=" in the URLs it creates. I'm fine without
> it too.

"none" is what you get when you omit the ";TLS=" parameter.  Having a
distinct "none" value wouldn't be backwards compatible with existing URL
interpretors.

		- Chris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: URLs and TLS
  - From: Michael Boe

References:
- Re: URLs and TLS
  - From: Paul Hoffman / IMC

Prev by Date: Re: URLs and TLS
Next by Date: Re: URLs and TLS
Previous by thread: Re: URLs and TLS
Next by thread: Re: URLs and TLS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread