[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Access Rights According to CSA

To: "Darren Shakib (Exchange)" <darrens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Access Rights According to CSA
From: Ned Freed <Ned.Freed@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1996 09:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "'ietf-calendar'" <ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx>, "'Frank Dawson'" <fdawson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Tue, 30 Jul 1996 08:33:03 -0700"<>
Sender: owner-ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx

> Maybe I am wrong, but isn't this discussion a little premature.  We have
> not defined any of the basic architecture for Calendaring, but we are
> discussing how to describe the access permissions via an undetermined
> protocol.

I agree 100%. And if something was in fact decided at this meeting,
the first thing that needs to happen is for the minutes of the meeting
to be posted to the list. As far as the IETF is concerned a meeting without
any reported minutes effectively didn't happen.

				Ned

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Access Rights According to CSA
  - From: John W. Noerenberg

References:
- RE: Access Rights According to CSA
  - From: Darren Shakib (Exchange)

Prev by Date: RE: Access Rights According to CSA
Next by Date: Re: Access Rights According to CSA
Previous by thread: RE: Access Rights According to CSA
Next by thread: RE: Access Rights According to CSA
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread