RE: Access Rights According to CSA

["John W. Noerenberg" <jwn2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 9:04 AM -0700 7/30/96, Ned Freed wrote:
>> Maybe I am wrong, but isn't this discussion a little premature.  We have
>> not defined any of the basic architecture for Calendaring, but we are
>> discussing how to describe the access permissions via an undetermined
>> protocol.
>
>I agree 100%. And if something was in fact decided at this meeting,
>the first thing that needs to happen is for the minutes of the meeting
>to be posted to the list. As far as the IETF is concerned a meeting without
>any reported minutes effectively didn't happen.

I just sent the minutes to Anik last night for his review.  It is a lengthy
tome.  I apologize for the delay, but we did cover rather a lot of ground
last week.

With Anik's permission, or if there is a great hue and cry to see them
sooner, I'll release the notes to the list without his review.

john noerenberg
jwn2@qualcomm.com
  --------------------------------------------------------------------
  Once the land touches you, the wind never blows so cold again.
  You feel for the land like it was your child.  When that happens
  to you, you can't be bought.
  -- W. P. Kinsella, "Shoeless Joe", 1982
  --------------------------------------------------------------------