RE: Access Rights According to CSA

[Shekhar Kirani <skirani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi:

I also support for posting the meeting minutes to the list as well as on   
the web.
To reiterate, here are the bullet items that I  would be interested in.
1) Completed IETF charter with all the milestone dates updated as was   
discussed
in the summit.
2) The set of customers and requirements that were brain-stormed during   
the morning
session of the meeting.
3) List of open issues that Dave put in on the board (such as naming,   
timezone, security
etc) and the summary of the meeting.

Once we have this set, we can start discussing about the most important   
things first
such as the architecture and the open issues.

Thanks,
Shekhar Kirani
Starfish Software

 ----------
From:  Ned Freed[SMTP:Ned.Freed@innosoft.com]
Sent:  Tuesday, July 30, 1996 9:26 AM
To:  Darren Shakib (Exchange)
Cc:  'ietf-calendar'; 'Frank Dawson'
Subject:  RE: Access Rights According to CSA

> Maybe I am wrong, but isn't this discussion a little premature.  We   
have
> not defined any of the basic architecture for Calendaring, but we are
> discussing how to describe the access permissions via an undetermined
> protocol.

I agree 100%. And if something was in fact decided at this meeting,
the first thing that needs to happen is for the minutes of the meeting
to be posted to the list. As far as the IETF is concerned a meeting   
without
any reported minutes effectively didn't happen.

    Ned