[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Access Control

To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ned Freed <Ned.Freed@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Access Control
From: Paul Rarey <Paul.Rarey@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 1996 22:35:34 -0700
Cc: Frank Dawson <fdawson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ietf-calendar <ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com> "Re: Access Control" (Jul 29, 14:29)
References: "Your message dated Mon 29 Jul 1996 11:06:59 -0700" <> <> <>
Reply-to: Paul Rarey <Paul.Rarey@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx

Thank-u Dave...

I actually spent [ time ] (2much) assimilating & focusing on the various terms & 
views of this list, trying to find a way to speak my views such that they did't 
fall into one or more factional areas. At least your reconciliation terms let me 
now go back and do what I really need to do - raise h&(^ with this 
specification. 

But that's me - a small part of the  - solution....

Best regards...,

Paul S. Rarey                 The Clorox Company Ph: 510.271.2160
Systems Architecture &        1221 Broadway      Fx: 510.208.1520
Electronic Munitions          Oakland, Ca.       94607-4309   USA

On Jul 29, 14:29, Dave Crocker wrote:
> Subject: Re: Access Control
>At 1:23 PM -0700 7/29/96, Ned Freed wrote:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Access Control
  - From: Einar Stefferud

References:
- Re: Access Control
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Access Control
  - From: Frank Dawson
- Re: Access Control
  - From: Dave Crocker

Prev by Date: ADMINISTRIVIA: Who is using Skymail?
Next by Date: A curiousity
Previous by thread: Re: Access Control
Next by thread: Re: Access Control
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread