[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Acronym collision!

To: hanna@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Acronym collision!
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 10:57:06 -0800
Cc: IETF calsch WG <ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
References: <><>
Sender: owner-ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx

At 8:23 AM -0800 12/4/96, Stephen R. Hanna wrote:
>The CIP team is currently favoring Simple Calendaring Interoperability
>Protocol (SCIP, pronounced like "skip"). Any objections or known
>conflicts?

	Sun has a security protocol with the acronym SKIP that they have
been pursuing with the IETF, so I suggest we stay away from SCIP.

d/

--------------------
Dave Crocker                                             +1 408 246 8253
Brandenburg Consulting                              fax: +1 408 249 6205
675 Spruce Dr.                                  dcrocker@brandenburg.com
Sunnyvale CA 94086 USA                        http://www.brandenburg.com

Internet Mail Consortium                http://www.imc.org, info@imc.org

References:
- Re: Acronym collision!
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: Acronym collision!
  - From: C. Harald Koch
- Re: Acronym collision!
  - From: Stephen R. Hanna

Prev by Date: Re: Acronym collision!
Next by Date: A few initial comments on "CIP" protocol
Previous by thread: Re: Acronym collision!
Next by thread: Re: Acronym collision!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread