RE: Issues Document for IETF-CALSCH Core Specification Document

["Derik Stenerson (Exchange)" <deriks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This is really great.  Having a formalized document to track the issues 
is just what we need to drive the issues to a close.

However, this posting is a bit premature, so please ignore it for the 
time being.  Frank didn't give me (the co-author) an opportunity to 
review the content before posting and there are some issues with "the 
issues" that need to be cleaned up before we all review them.  I've 
talked to Frank and we are going to revise this document and repost a 
final draft tomorrow.  We will also bring hardcopy of the document to 
the meeting next week.

> ----------
> From: 	owner-ietf-calendar@imc.org[SMTP:owner-ietf-calendar@imc.org] on 
> behalf of Frank Dawson[SMTP:fdawson@earthlink.net]
> Sent: 	Thursday, December 05, 1996 12:44 PM
> To: 	Derik Stenerson (Exchange); 'IETF Calendaring & Scheduling Mail 
> List'
> Cc: 	'Anik Ganguly'; 'Cynthia Clark'; 'Paul Hoffman'
> Subject: 	Issues Document for IETF-CALSCH Core Specification Document
> 
> <<File: ietf-calsch-issues-core-00.doc>>
> Derik:
> 
> Your thoughts about an issues document for the IETF-CALSCH Core Object 
> Specification document is a good idea.
> 
> I took your notes and my original set of issues sent out last October 
> and merged then into a more formal issues document with both of our 
> names on it. I am submitting this to the mailing list and to Anik 
> Ganguly to have it submitted as an IETF-CALSCH WG document. 
> 
> This would be a good set of issues to discuss at the upcoming IETF 
> meeting.
> 
> Great idea.
> 
> - - Frank Dawson
> 
>  
>