[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The need for a protocol

To: Shekhar Kirani <skirani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: The need for a protocol
From: "Peter O'Leary" <poleary@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 15:41:52 -0800
Cc: ietf-calendar <ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx>
Organization: Clear Blue Network Systems, Inc.
References: <>
Reply-to: poleary@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx

Shekhar Kirani wrote:
> 
> Hi:
> 
> I agree that we need a less latency transport protocol in addition to
> e-mail
> based protocol. The questions in yesterday's meeting was more about
> reusing existing protocols such as HTTP v/s inventing a new protocol.
> 
> Thanks,
> Shekhar Kirani

This is exactly right. I think that we have established that
interoperability via *both* e-mail and a direct TCP connection of some
sort is important for the WG.

Pete.

References:
- RE: The need for a protocol
  - From: Shekhar Kirani

Prev by Date: RE: Next Calendaring WG meeting
Next by Date: Re: The need for a protocol
Previous by thread: RE: The need for a protocol
Next by thread: Re: The need for a protocol
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread