Re: Heirarchical error codes

[sman@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Steve Mansour)]

It's on hold for now.
-Steve

Frank Dawson wrote:

> Steve:
>
> I disagree with adding Rob's suggestion for the CUA to also issue a
> CAPABILITIES response. Please refer to my earlier post.
>
> It is unclear to me why this CUA input is necessary. If we are to make the
> CAP protocol more complex with some sort of CUA-CS capability negotiation,
> then we need to have some more requirements/scenarios for this. I disagree
> with adding this to the strawman. I can't figure out what scenario would
> require this and hence what the implications are. We certainly would not
> have a full capabilities negotiation feature with this. This actually seems
> to add confusion to this feature, as it stands.
>
> - - Frank
begin:vcard 
n:Mansour;Steve
tel;fax:650.937.2103
tel;work:650.937.2378
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Netscape
adr:version:2.1;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:sman@netscape.com
title:Judge, Jury, and Executioner
fn:Steve Mansour
end:vcard