Re: Heirarchical error codes

[Doug Royer <Doug.Royer@xxxxxxx>]

> From: "Frank Dawson" <fdawson@earthlink.net>
> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 08:55:39 -0500

> > ...
> >
> >  C: * CAPABILITY CAP XMLCAL
> >  S: * CAPABILITY CAP SASL ("KERBEROS_V4" "GSSAPI" "DIGEST-MD5") TLS
> >
> >(using * instead of a normal tag because these aren't commands; they're
> >information which doesn't require a reply.)
> 
> This seems like unnecessary bits-on-the-wire for the CUA. Shouldn't the CUA
> just query the CS and respond accordingly?
> 
> What scenario did you have in mind that necessitated the CUA to also specify
> it's capabilities? Just because I have a capability doesn't mean that in a
> given session instance that I am going to use it. So what good is it to the
> CS for the CUA to provide this input?
> 
> Can you give us an example?

CUA protocol version?

-Doug
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Doug.Royer@Sun.COM		http://playground.sun.com/~dougr
801 W. El Camino #131		Work:   (650)786-7599
Mountain View, CA 94040		Ham Radio: N6AAW, Aviation: PP-ASEL