Re: IRIP version 4 (Part 1) c

[John Stracke <francis@xxxxxxxx>]

Steve Mansour wrote:

> I don't think rfc 2068 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1) is
> the successor to 1738. If anyone knows of the successor to 1738 please
> reply. Someone at the ietf meeting had mentioned the successor was
> 2368, I read it, but as it only describes the mailto url I don't think
> it's the successor.

2396 defines URIs.

--
/=============================================================\
|John Stracke    | My opinions are my own | S/MIME & HTML OK  |
|francis@ecal.com|============================================|
|Chief Scientist | NT's lack of reliability is only surpassed |
|eCal Corp.      |  by its lack of scalability. -- John Kirch |
\=============================================================/