Everyone else agree with this change. If so, can I hear some "electronic hums" so we can get a concensus and close this item.
----- Forwarded by Pat R Egen/Egen Consulting/01 on 07/27/99 05:02 PM -----
Doug Royer <Doug.Royer@Sun.COM> Sent by: owner-ietf-calendar@imc.org
07/27/99 02:36 PM
Please respond to Doug Royer
To: ietf-calendar@imc.org
cc:
Subject: Re: RFC-2445: ABNF/prose mismatch on parameters
I think that does it.
> From: Frank_Dawson@lotus.com
> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 17:08:05 GMT
>
> Doug (and others):
>
> Current ABNF says:
> eventc = "BEGIN" ":" "VEVENT" CRLF
> eventprop *alarmc
> "END" ":" "VEVENT" CRLF
>
> Would the following combination of ABNF and comments be sufficient to
> address this issue? And then similar specification for other such
> instances in the ABNF?
>
> eventc = "BEGIN" ":" "VEVENT" CRLF
> 1*(eventprop / alarmc) ;Must have at
> least one eventprop
> "END" ":" "VEVENT" CRLF
>
> -- Frank
-Doug
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Doug.Royer@Sun.COM http://playground.sun.com/~dougr
Pager: Doug.Royer@Pager.Eng.Sun.com
801 W. El Camino #131 Work: (650)786-7599
Mountain View, CA 94040 Ham Radio: N6AAW, Aviation: PP-ASEL