[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: CAP draft
To
: Doug Royer <
Doug.Royer@xxxxxxx
>
Subject
: Re: CAP draft
From
:
pregen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date
: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 20:31:36 GMT
Cc
:
ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx
List-archive
: <
http://www.imc.org/ietf-calendar/mail-archive/
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:ietf-calendar-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe
>
Sender
:
owner-ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx
Yes, we should. That's on my to-do list today to ask if we could do that. Based on the activity, I would say yes.
Doug Royer <Doug.Royer@Sun.COM>
Sent by: owner-ietf-calendar@imc.org
07/28/99 03:55 PM
Please respond to Doug Royer
To: ietf-calendar@imc.org
cc:
Subject: CAP draft
Now that the IETF draft door seems to be open again. Should we
post CAP.TXT to the IETF as draft-ietf-calsch-cap-00.txt (or whatever)?
-Doug
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Doug.Royer@Sun.COM http://playground.sun.com/~dougr
Pager: Doug.Royer@Pager.Eng.Sun.com
801 W. El Camino #131 Work: (650)786-7599
Mountain View, CA 94040 Ham Radio: N6AAW, Aviation: PP-ASEL
Prev by Date:
Re: Oslo assignments
Next by Date:
RE: Recurring Anniversary Instances?
Previous by thread:
CAP draft
Next by thread:
Re: CAP draft
Index(es):
Date
Thread