RE: Recurring Anniversary Instances?

[Doug Royer <Doug.Royer@xxxxxxx>]

> From: Bruce_Kahn@iris.com
> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 12:01:24 -0400
> 
> ...
>
> Is DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:19990730 equivalent to 
> DTSTART;VALUE=DATE-TIME:19990730T000000Z?

No, not at all!

> Is DTEND;VALUE=DATE:19990730 equivalent to 
> DTEND;VALUE=DATE-TIME:19990730T235959Z (or should that be 
> DTEND;VALUE=DATE-TIME:19990801T000000Z since its "non-inclusive")?

No, not at all!

> RFC 2445 has only the following relevant text (for DTSTART):
> ...

> There is no explicit declaration of what the start (or end) time default 
> to in the VALUE=DATE cases.   Before continuing Id like to get concensus 
> (or murmers)...

No time at all - that's the point.

If I PUBLISH a VEVENT for New Years Day, it's Jan 1 in the CUA's time zone.
Its not 00:00:00Z, or 00:00:00 US/Pacific or 00:00:00 in any other time zone.