Re: SKI Presentation in Oslo

[John Stracke <francis@xxxxxxxx>]

Frank_Dawson@lotus.com wrote:

>
> >Remember that whatever you come up with needs to
> >have a reasonable chance of being able to fit into existing calendar
>
> John: I heard the SKICAL folks say that the "unscheduled" event had a
> date/time that the event was probably going to occur (i.e., a DSTART
> and DTEND with a STATUS:TENTATIVE or event a new enumeration of
> STATUS:UNSCHEDULED), but that it would get updated, once it had been
> actually scheduled (i.e., confirmed).

OK, *that* I'm comfortable with (and would be willing to support).
Thanks for the clarification.

--
/=============================================================\
|John Stracke    | My opinions are my own | S/MIME & HTML OK  |
|francis@ecal.com|============================================|
|Chief Scientist | NT's lack of reliability is only surpassed |
|eCal Corp.      |  by its lack of scalability. -- John Kirch |
\=============================================================/