2.0.2 "error" code

[Antoine Leca <Antoine.Leca@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Both iRIP and CAP drafts have this code to deal with commands that are under
processing (SENDDATA with timeout).

What I do not understand is why we did not use the 1.xx code set up by RFC 2445:
>
>      |==============+===============================================|
>      | Short Return | Longer Return Status Description              |
>      | Status Code  |                                               |
>      |==============+===============================================|
>      |    1.xx      | Preliminary success. This class of status     |
>      |              | of status code indicates that the request has |
>      |              | request has been initially processed but that |
>      |              | completion is pending.                        |
>      |==============+===============================================|
>      |    2.xx      | Successful. This class of status code         |
>      |              | indicates that the request was completed      |
>      |              | successfuly. However, the exact status code   |
>      |              | can indicate that a fallback has been taken.  |
>      |==============+===============================================|


In fact, it appears to me as if the code 1.xx of RFC 2445 is not to be used at all
with iRIP or CAP.

Probably I miss something (an dI hope this had not been debatted to death),
but I fail to see what.


Antoine