Re: W-6 SKI project additions

[Doug Royer <Doug.Royer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Maybe I am mistaken.

I thought people were concerned with backward computability.
I do not think the idea was rejected. Just that it needs to
be compatible.

Then there was talk about a new working group so that
iCalendar and CAP could proceed. I thought they were related.

PAT?

-Doug

Greg FitzPatrick wrote:
> 
> This surprises me, I thought that once we had solved the syntax problems,
> that there was a consensus for this addition.
> 
> Greg
> 
> Doug Royer wrote:
> 
> > W-6 Do we need to handle 'unscheduled
> >     event' as described by the SKI project?
> >
> > I think that consensus is N. This is to be added as
> > an additional work item (draft) or new working group.
> >
> >
> > --
begin:vcard 
n:Royer;Doug
tel;pager:pager@royer.com or 650-274-8960
tel;cell:650-274-8960
tel;fax:805-957-1544
tel;work:805-957-1790 x541
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://Royer.com/People/Doug
org:Software.com
version:2.1
email;internet:Doug.Royer@Software.com
title:Architect
adr;quoted-printable:;;530 E. Montecito St.=0D=0A;Santa Barbara;CA;93103;U.S.A
fn:Doug Royer
end:vcard