Michael Krivoruchko wrote: > It looks to me like _very_ different grammars: > 1. DTD allows element from 'freebusy.opt1' to appear more than once in > 'freebusy' element; this is not allowed by RFC2445 > > 2. DTD does not allow element from 'freebusy.opt1' appear after element > from 'freebusy.optm'; there is no such restriction in RFC2445 > They should be the same. > The grammar in RFC2445#4.6.4 is not in EBNF because of restrictions > in comments which have sense for a reader but have no any sense for > a parser. Not a problem as there is no requirement the RFC text be parsable by a machine.
begin:vcard n:Royer;Doug tel;pager:650-274-8960 or pager@Royer.com tel;cell:650-274-8960 tel;home:650-274-8960 tel;work:805-957-1790 x541 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://Royer.com/People/Doug version:2.1 email;internet:doug@home.royer.com adr;quoted-printable:;;801 Woodside Rd. #14=0D=0ASuite 244;Redwood City;CA;94061;USA x-mozilla-cpt:;0 fn:Doug Royer end:vcard
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature