Archive of ietf-calendar/archive1, by thread

• RE: MIME as an appointment element separator - good move..., (continued)
  • RE: MIME as an appointment element separator - good move..., Alec Dun
• Clarification, Se-Wai Lee (Exchange)
• Quick comments on the "sch" and "csct" drafts, Ross Finlayson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Quick comments on the "sch" and "csct" drafts, Alec Dun
  • RE: Quick comments on the "sch" and "csct" drafts, Frank Dawson
  • RE: Quick comments on the "sch" and "csct" drafts, Frank Dawson
  • RE: Quick comments on the "sch" and "csct" drafts, Alec Dun
    • vCal vs. new (was "RE: Quick comments on the "sch" and "csct" drafts"), Jay Batson
    • Re: RE: Quick comments on the "sch" and "csct" drafts, Mark Horton
    • Quoting (Was: Quick comments on the "sch" and "csct" drafts), Pete Resnick
  • RE: Quick comments on the "sch" and "csct" drafts, Alec Dun
  • RE: Quick comments on the "sch" and "csct" drafts, Frank Dawson
  • RE: Quick comments on the "sch" and "csct" drafts, Alec Dun
• ISO 8601 ABNF grammar, Chris Newman
  • Re: ISO 8601 ABNF grammar, Tim Howes
    • Re: ISO 8601 ABNF grammar, Harald.T.Alvestrand
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: ISO 8601 ABNF grammar, Frank Dawson
    • RE: ISO 8601 ABNF grammar, Chris Newman
    • RE: ISO 8601 ABNF grammar, John W. Noerenberg
  • RE: ISO 8601 ABNF grammar, Frank Dawson
• Meeting next Tuesday -- is it enough?, Jay Batson
• ISO 8601, Chris Newman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: ISO 8601, Frank Dawson
• MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Skip Montanaro
  • Message not available
    • Re: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Mark Horton
      • RE[2]: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Dr. Mark K. Joseph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Lewis Geer (Exchange)
    • Re: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Mike Weston
    • RE: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Skip Montanaro
  • Re: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Steve Carter
  • RE: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Lewis Geer (Exchange)
    • Re: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Keith Moore
  • RE: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Lewis Geer (Exchange)
  • RE: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Alec Dun
    • Re: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Paul Rarey
      • Re: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Ken Shan
    • Re: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Mike Weston
    • RE: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., John W. Noerenberg
  • RE: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Roland H. Alden
  • RE: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Alec Dun
  • RE: RE[2]: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Alec Dun
    • Re: RE[2]: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Ken Shan
      • Re: RE[2]: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Skip Montanaro
    • Re: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Paul Rarey
      • Re: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Peter O'Leary
  • RE: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Lewis Geer (Exchange)
  • RE: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Roland H. Alden
  • RE: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Lewis Geer (Exchange)
  • RE: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Roland H. Alden
    • RE: MIME as a vCalendar element separator, Jay Batson
  • Re: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Rik Drummond
  • Re: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Robert Moskowitz
    • Re: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Skip Montanaro
      • Re: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Skip Montanaro
  • Re: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Robert Moskowitz
  • RE: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Frank Dawson
  • RE: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Frank Dawson
  • RE: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Frank Dawson
  • RE: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Alec Dun
  • RE: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Alec Dun
  • RE: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Frank Dawson
  • RE: MIME as a vCalendar element separator - bad move..., Lewis Geer (Exchange)
• Your Issues, Frank Dawson
• Win32 support for TimeZone info, Vinod Seraphin/CAM/Lotus
• Thoughts/questions on CIP, Bruce_Kahn%IRIS
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-csp-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Minutes of the Dec 10 meeting, Anik Ganguly
• Issues Document for IETF-CALSCH Core Specification Document, Frank Dawson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Issues Document for IETF-CALSCH Core Specification Document, Derik Stenerson (Exchange)
    • Re: Issues Document for IETF-CALSCH Core Specification Document, Keith Moore
  • RE: Issues Document for IETF-CALSCH Core Specification Document, Derik Stenerson (Exchange)
  • RE: Issues Document for IETF-CALSCH Core Specification Document, Frank Dawson
• CounterOffer issue, Gilles Fortin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CounterOffer issue, Vinod Seraphin/CAM/Lotus
    • Re: CounterOffer issue, Keith Moore
    • Re: CounterOffer issue, Kevin George
  • RE: CounterOffer issue, Alec Dun
  • Re: CounterOffer issue, Rik Drummond
    • Re: CounterOffer issue, Keith Moore
      • Re: CounterOffer issue, Steve Simmons
    • Re: CounterOffer issue, Chris Newman
  • RE: CounterOffer issue, Alec Dun
  • Re: CounterOffer issue, Rik Drummond
  • RE: CounterOffer issue, Rik Drummond
  • RE: CounterOffer issue, Frank Dawson
  • RE: CounterOffer issue, Frank Dawson
  • Re: CounterOffer issue, Rik Drummond
  • RE: CounterOffer issue, Lewis Geer (Exchange)
  • RE: CounterOffer issue, Rik Drummond
  • RE: CounterOffer issue, Frank Dawson
  • RE: CounterOffer issue, Vinod Seraphin/CAM/Lotus
  • RE: CounterOffer issue, Martin Knutson
• More on merged drafts., Alec Dun
  • Re: More on merged drafts., Ken Shan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • FW: More on merged drafts., Frank Dawson
  • RE: More on merged drafts., Alec Dun
    • Re: More on merged drafts., Ken Shan
    • Re: More on merged drafts., Mike Weston
      • Re: More on merged drafts., Ned Freed
      • Re: More on merged drafts., Keith Moore
    • Re: More on merged drafts., Keith Moore
  • RE: More on merged drafts., Frank Dawson
    • Message not available
      • Re: More on merged drafts., Mark Horton
  • RE: More on merged drafts., Robert Moskowitz
  • RE: More on merged drafts., Lewis Geer (Exchange)
    • Re: More on merged drafts., Mark Towfiq - PC Networking
      • Re: More on merged drafts., Chris Newman
    • Message not available
      • Re: More on merged drafts., Mark Horton
      • Re: More on merged drafts., Jay Batson
  • RE: More on merged drafts., Frank Dawson
  • RE: More on merged drafts., Lewis Geer (Exchange)
    • Re: More on merged drafts., Ken Shan
  • Re: More on merged drafts., Steve Carter
  • RE: More on merged drafts., Frank Dawson
  • RE: More on merged drafts., Lewis Geer (Exchange)
  • RE: More on merged drafts., Lewis Geer (Exchange)
    • Re: More on merged drafts., Keith Moore
      • oops (was Re: More on merged drafts. ), Keith Moore
  • RE: More on merged drafts., Frank Dawson
  • Re: More on merged drafts., Skip Montanaro
  • RE: More on merged drafts., Roland H. Alden
    • RE: More on merged drafts., Chris Newman
    • RE: More on merged drafts., Ned Freed
  • RE: More on merged drafts., Lewis Geer (Exchange)
  • RE: More on merged drafts., Roland H. Alden
  • Re: More on merged drafts., Robert Moskowitz
  • Re: More on merged drafts., Robert Moskowitz
  • RE: More on merged drafts., Robert Moskowitz
  • Re: More on merged drafts., Robert Moskowitz
  • Re: More on merged drafts., Robert Moskowitz
    • Re: More on merged drafts., Ned Freed
  • RE: More on merged drafts., Frank Dawson
  • RE: More on merged drafts., Frank Dawson
• A few initial comments on "CIP" protocol, Chris Newman
  • Re: A few initial comments on "CIP" protocol, Keith Moore
    • Re: A few initial comments on "CIP" protocol, Chris Newman
      • Re: A few initial comments on "CIP" protocol, Pete Resnick
      • Re: A few initial comments on "CIP" protocol, Chris Newman
      • Re: A few initial comments on "CIP" protocol, Keith Moore
      • Message not available
      • Re: A few initial comments on "CIP" protocol, Mark Horton
  • Re: A few initial comments on "CIP" protocol, Pete Resnick
    • Re: A few initial comments on "CIP" protocol, Chris Newman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A few initial comments on "CIP" protocol, Robert Moskowitz
    • Re: A few initial comments on "CIP" protocol, Keith Moore
  • Re: A few initial comments on "CIP" protocol, Robert Moskowitz
• Microsoft Document IS NOT A Merged Document, Frank Dawson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • re: Microsoft Document IS NOT A Merged Document, John_Binici/Iris.IRIS
  • RE: Microsoft Document IS NOT A Merged Document, Alec Dun
  • RE: Microsoft Document IS NOT A Merged Document, John_Binici/Iris.IRIS
  • RE: Microsoft Document IS NOT A Merged Document, Lewis Geer (Exchange)
  • Re: RE: Microsoft Document IS NOT A Merged Document, Steve Carter
  • RE: RE: Microsoft Document IS NOT A Merged Document, Lewis Geer (Exchange)
  • RE: RE: Microsoft Document IS NOT A Merged Document, Frank Dawson
  • Re: RE: RE: Microsoft Document IS NOT A Merged Document, Steve Carter
  • Re: RE: Microsoft Document IS NOT A Merged Document, Uppili Srinivasan
  • RE: Microsoft Document IS NOT A Merged Document, Anik Ganguly
    • Re: Microsoft Document IS NOT A Merged Document, Paul Rarey
  • RE: Microsoft Document IS NOT A Merged Document, Matthew Wall
  • Re: RE: Microsoft Document IS NOT A Merged Document, Steve Carter
• Fwd: date calculations library, C. Harald Koch
• Acronym collision!, Patrik Faltstrom
  • Re: Acronym collision!, Harald.T.Alvestrand
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Acronym collision!, Anik Ganguly
    • Re: Acronym collision!, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Acronym collision!, C. Harald Koch
      • Re: Acronym collision!, Stephen R. Hanna
      • Re: Acronym collision!, Jeff Smith
      • Re: Acronym collision!, Dave Crocker
  • Re: Acronym collision!, Robert Moskowitz
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-cip-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-cip-00.txt, Alec Dun
    • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-cip-00.txt, Peter O'Leary
      • Message not available
      • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-cip-00.txt, Mark Horton
  • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-cip-00.txt, Anik Ganguly
• Peer to peer protocol, Anik Ganguly
• cc: re: Agenda for CalSch, Ralph Patterson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • cc: RE: Agenda for Calsch, Ralph Patterson
• Agenda for CalSch, Anik Ganguly
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Agenda for CalSch, Anik Ganguly
  • Agenda for CalSch, Anik Ganguly
    • Re: Agenda for CalSch, Pete Resnick
  • RE: Agenda for CalSch, Frank Dawson
  • RE: Agenda for CalSch, Lewis Geer (Exchange)
  • RE: Agenda for CalSch, Robert Moskowitz
  • Agenda for Calsch, Anik Ganguly
    • Re: Agenda for Calsch, Harald.T.Alvestrand
    • Re: Agenda for Calsch, Harald.T.Alvestrand
  • Re: Agenda for Calsch, Bruce_Kahn
    • Re: Agenda for Calsch, Harald.T.Alvestrand
  • RE: Agenda for Calsch, Alec Dun
    • Re: Agenda for Calsch, Harald.T.Alvestrand
  • Re: Agenda for Calsch, Frank Dawson
  • RE: Agenda for Calsch, Alec Dun
    • Re: Agenda for Calsch, Harald.T.Alvestrand
  • Re: Agenda for Calsch, Bruce_Kahn
    • Re: Agenda for Calsch, Harald.T.Alvestrand
  • Re: Agenda for Calsch, Bruce_Kahn
  • RE: Agenda for Calsch, Frank Dawson
  • Re[2]: Agenda for Calsch, John Rose
    • Re: Re[2]: Agenda for Calsch, Harald.T.Alvestrand
      • Alarms (was Re: Re[2]: Agenda for Calsch), Chris Newman
      • Re: Alarms (was Re: Re[2]: Agenda for Calsch), Don Lavange
    • Relative Alarms, Phil Wolff
  • Re[2]: Agenda for Calsch, John Rose
  • RE: Agenda for Calsch, Alec Dun
    • Re: Agenda for Calsch, Harald.T.Alvestrand
  • Re: Agenda for Calsch, Frank Dawson
  • Re: Agenda for Calsch, Frank Dawson
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-sch-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-sch-00.txt, Peter O'Leary
    • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-sch-00.txt, Keith Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-sch-00.txt, Lewis Geer (Exchange)
    • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-sch-00.txt, Peter O'Leary
  • RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-sch-00.txt, Lewis Geer (Exchange)
  • RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-sch-00.txt, Alec Dun
    • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-sch-00.txt, Peter O'Leary
• FW: draft-ietf-asid-mime-direct-03.txt, Lewis Geer (Exchange)
• Merged Draft containing feedback from all of you., Alec Dun
  • Re: Merged Draft containing feedback from all of you., Keith Moore
• New draft on the Web site, Paul E. Hoffman
• Ease of implementing repeated events 'timeshifts' proposal?, Ross Finlayson
  • Re: Ease of implementing repeated events 'timeshifts' proposal?, Pete Resnick
  • Re: Ease of implementing repeated events 'timeshifts' proposal?, Keith Moore
  • Re: Ease of implementing repeated events 'timeshifts' proposal?, Harald.T.Alvestrand
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Ease of implementing repeated events 'timeshifts' proposal?, Frank Dawson
  • RE: Ease of implementing repeated events 'timeshifts' proposal?, Lewis Geer (Exchange)
    • Re: Ease of implementing repeated events 'timeshifts' proposal?, Harald.T.Alvestrand
    • Message not available
      • Re: Ease of implementing repeated events 'timeshifts' proposal?, Mark Horton
  • RE: Ease of implementing repeated events 'timeshifts' proposal?, Ross Finlayson
  • RE: Ease of implementing repeated events 'timeshifts' proposal?, Lewis Geer (Exchange)
  • RE: Ease of implementing repeated events 'timeshifts' proposal?, Lewis Geer (Exchange)
• Time Specification Requirements, Anik Ganguly
  • Re: Time Specification Requirements, Keith Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Time Specification Requirements, Philippe Kahn
    • Re: Time Specification Requirements, Keith Moore
  • Re: Time Specification Requirements, Philippe Kahn
• [rec.humor.funny] Only Microsoft could come up with this one..., Keith Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [rec.humor.funny] Only Microsoft could come up with this one..., Lewis Geer (Exchange)
• Time representation: A solution to satisfy everyone?, Ross Finlayson
  • Why use names of timezones?, Patrik Faltstrom
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why use names of timezones?, Mark Horton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Time representation: A solution to satisfy everyone?, Ross Finlayson
    • Message not available
      • Re: Time representation: A solution to satisfy everyone?, Mark Horton
  • Re: Time representation: A solution to satisfy everyone?, Ross Finlayson
    • Message not available
      • Re: Time representation: A solution to satisfy everyone?, Mark Horton
  • Re: Time representation: A solution to satisfy everyone?, Ross Finlayson
    • Message not available
      • Re: Time representation: A solution to satisfy everyone?, Mark Horton
  • Re: Time representation: A solution to satisfy everyone?, Ross Finlayson
    • Message not available
      • Re: Time representation: A solution to satisfy everyone?, Mark Horton
    • Re: Time representation: A solution to satisfy everyone?, John C Klensin
      • Re: Time representation: A solution to satisfy everyone?, Chris Newman
  • Re: Time representation: A solution to satisfy everyone?, Ross Finlayson
• Re: Time zone of the meeting., Ross Finlayson
  • Re: Time zone of the meeting., Keith Moore
• Automatic DST, Denis BIGORGNE
• Rep (2) : Allow Local Time, Denis BIGORGNE
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Rep (2) : Allow Local Time, Frank Dawson
    • Re: Allow Local Time, Pete Resnick
    • Re: Rep (2) : Allow Local Time, Keith Moore
• Re:, Roger Fajman
• RE:, Roger Fajman
  • Re:, Ken Shan
  • Re:, C. Harald Koch
• reminder of Internet-Draft cutoff date, Keith Moore
• RE: Allow Local Time, Frank Dawson
  • RE: Allow Local Time, Chris Newman
  • Re: Allow Local Time, Keith Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Allow Local Time, Frank Dawson
    • Re: Allow Local Time, Keith Moore
    • RE: Allow Local Time, Chris Newman
  • RE: Allow Local Time, Ross Finlayson
  • Re: Allow Local Time, David Boreham
  • Re: Allow Local Time, Denis BIGORGNE
    • Re: Allow Local Time, Keith Moore
  • RE: Allow Local Time, Frank Dawson
    • Re: Allow Local Time, Keith Moore
  • RE: Allow Local Time, Frank Dawson
    • Re: Allow Local Time, Keith Moore
• RE:, Frank Dawson
  • RE:, Chris Newman
• RE:, Frank Dawson
  • RE:, Patrik Faltstrom
• RE: your mail, Frank Dawson
• IETF Calendar Working Group Members, Eileen Stanley
  • Re: IETF Calendar Working Group Members, Peter O'Leary
  • Re: IETF Calendar Working Group Members, Dave Crocker
• time coordinates proposals, Denis BIGORGNE
  • Re: time coordinates proposals, Ken Shan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: time coordinates proposals, Ross Finlayson
• RE: Recurring events (was Merging the drafts), Bill Bliss (Exchange)
• SF meeting in Nov?, Jason Gabler
• Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Ross Finlayson
  • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Mark Handley
    • Message not available
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Mark Horton
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, William P. Spencer
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Keith Moore
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Mark Handley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re[2]: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Chuck_Grandgent
  • Re: Re[2]: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, William Wyatt/PicTel
  • RE: Re[2]: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Bill Bliss (Exchange)
    • Re: Re[2]: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, C. Harald Koch
      • Re: Re[2]: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Ken Shan
  • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Ross Finlayson
  • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Ross Finlayson
    • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Keith Moore
  • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Ross Finlayson
    • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Ken Shan
    • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Keith Moore
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Ken Shan
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Keith Moore
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Ken Shan
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Keith Moore
  • RE: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Bill Bliss (Exchange)
  • RE: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Ross Finlayson
    • Message not available
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Mark Horton
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Ken Shan
  • RE: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Andrew Shuman (Exchange)
  • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Ross Finlayson
    • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Ken Shan
    • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Keith Moore
    • Message not available
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Mark Horton
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Keith Moore
  • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Ross Finlayson
    • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Keith Moore
      • Time zone of the meeting., Peter O'Leary
      • Re: Time zone of the meeting., Keith Moore
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Ken Shan
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Keith Moore
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Ken Shan
  • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Ross Finlayson
    • VERSIT vCalendar compliancy, Saad Mir
  • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Anik Ganguly
  • RE: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Frank Dawson
    • RE: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Patrik Faltstrom
    • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Ken Shan
      • Message not available
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Mark Horton
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Ken Shan
      • Message not available
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Mark Horton
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Chris Newman
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Keith Moore
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Ken Shan
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Keith Moore
    • Message not available
      • Re: Specifying repeated events in the face of DST changes, Mark Horton
• Time coordinates && Merging the drafts., Denis BIGORGNE
  • Message not available
    • Re: Time coordinates && Merging the drafts., Mark Horton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Time coordinates && Merging the drafts., Frank Dawson
  • RE: Time coordinates && Merging the drafts., Denis BIGORGNE
• Time coordinates, Denis BIGORGNE
  • Re: Time coordinates, Ken Shan
  • Re: Time coordinates, Andras Salamon
  • Re: Time coordinates, Ned Freed
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Time coordinates, Robert Visnov
    • Re: Time coordinates, Keith Moore
  • RE: Time coordinates, Theodore Lorek
    • Re: Time coordinates, Ken Shan
      • Re: Time coordinates, Andras Salamon
      • Re: Time coordinates, Ken Shan
      • Re: Time coordinates, Nathaniel Borenstein
      • Re: Time coordinates, Ken Shan
  • Re: Time coordinates, Ross Finlayson
  • RE: Time coordinates, Denis BIGORGNE
  • RE: Time coordinates, Frank Dawson
    • RE: Time coordinates, Patrik Faltstrom
    • Re: Time coordinates, Keith Moore
      • Re: Time coordinates, Ken Shan
      • Re: Time coordinates, Keith Moore
      • Re: Time coordinates, Ken Shan
      • Re: Time coordinates, Keith Moore
      • Re: Time coordinates, Ken Shan
      • Re: Time coordinates, Keith Moore
      • Re: Time coordinates, Ken Shan
      • Re: Time coordinates, Keith Moore
      • Re: Time coordinates, Ken Shan
      • Re: Time coordinates, Keith Moore
      • Re: Time coordinates, Ken Shan
      • Message not available
      • Re: Time coordinates, Mark Horton
      • Re: Time coordinates, Ken Shan
      • Message not available
      • Re: Time coordinates, Mark Horton
      • Re: Time coordinates, Ken Shan
      • Message not available
      • Re: Time coordinates, Mark Horton
      • Re: Time coordinates, John C Klensin
      • Message not available
      • Re: Time coordinates, Mark Horton
      • Re: Time coordinates, John C Klensin
      • Message not available
      • Re: Time coordinates, Mark Horton
      • Re: Time coordinates, John C Klensin
      • Re: Time coordinates, Ken Shan
  • Re: Time coordinates, Paul B. Hill
• Merging the drafts., Alec Dun
  • Message not available
    • Re: Merging the drafts., Mark Horton
  • Re: Merging the drafts., Ned Freed
  • Re: Merging the drafts., Keith Moore
    • Re: Merging the drafts., Frederick G.M. Roeber
      • Re: Merging the drafts., Keith Moore
  • Recurring events (was Merging the drafts), C. Harald Koch
  • Re: Merging the drafts., Tim Howes
    • Re: Merging the drafts., Harald.T.Alvestrand
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Merging the drafts., Mark Towfiq
    • Re: Merging the drafts., Keith Moore
  • RE: Merging the drafts., James L. Weiner
    • Re: Merging the drafts., Mark Towfiq - PC Networking
  • RE: Merging the drafts., Frank Dawson
    • Re: Merging the drafts., Harald.T.Alvestrand
  • RE: Merging the drafts., Frank Dawson
  • RE: Merging the drafts., Frank Dawson
    • RE: Merging the drafts., Ned Freed
• [no subject], Frank Dawson
  • Re: your mail, Patrik Faltstrom
  • [no subject], C. Harald Koch
  • [no subject], Ned Freed
  • [no subject], Keith Moore
  • Re: (Merging the drafts), Peter O'Leary
• Faux Pas, Frank Dawson
  • Documents for the Working Group, Paul E. Hoffman
• Re: Internet Conference Calendar Web submission, conf-admin
• New ICAP draft., Peter O'Leary
  • Message not available
    • list of vendors?, Mark Horton
      • Re: list of vendors?, John C Klensin
      • Re: list of vendors?, Peter O'Leary
      • Re: list of vendors?, Andrew Scott
      • Re: list of vendors?, Harald.T.Alvestrand
• ARGH!!! EMAIL filter error!, Robert Moskowitz
  • Re: ARGH!!! EMAIL filter error!, Paul E. Hoffman
• CALSCH is now approved as a WG, Harald.T.Alvestrand
• Meeting during Dec. IETF meeting, Anik Ganguly
  • Re: Meeting during Dec. IETF meeting, Peter O'Leary
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Meeting during Dec. IETF meeting, Frank Dawson
  • Re: Meeting during Dec. IETF meeting, Yvonne Tso
• Re: Specification Merge, Steve Carter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Specification Merge, Alec Dun
    • Re: Specification Merge, Harald.T.Alvestrand
• Calendaring charter, Harald.T.Alvestrand
  • Re: Calendaring charter, Mike Weston
    • Re: Calendaring charter, Harald.T.Alvestrand
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Calendaring charter -Reply, Steve Carter
    • Re: Calendaring charter -Reply, Dave Crocker
    • Re: Calendaring charter -Reply, Peter O'Leary
    • Re: Calendaring charter -Reply, Harald.T.Alvestrand
  • RE: Calendaring charter -Reply, Lewis Geer (Exchange)
  • RE: Calendaring charter -Reply, Frank Dawson
    • RE: Calendaring charter -Reply, William P. Spencer
  • Re: Calendaring charter -Reply, Steve Carter
  • Re: Calendaring charter -Reply, Bruce_Kahn%IRIS
    • Re: Calendaring charter -Reply, Jay Batson
  • Fwd: Calendaring charter -Reply, Uppili Srinivasan
• Document Archive, Don LaVange
  • Re: Document Archive, Dave Crocker
• Revised charter - 3, Anik Ganguly
  • Re: Revised charter - 3, Dave Crocker
    • Fwd: Re: Revised charter - 3, Jay Batson
  • Re: Revised charter - 3, Harald.T.Alvestrand
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Revised charter - 3, Frank Dawson
  • Re: Revised charter - 3 -Reply, Steve Carter
    • Re: Revised charter - 3 -Reply, Dave Crocker
• Proposed Charter - Status, Anik Ganguly
  • Re: Proposed Charter - Status, Dave Crocker
    • Re: Proposed Charter - Status, Einar Stefferud
  • Re: Proposed Charter - Status, Mike Weston
• Comments on WG charter., Peter O'Leary
• Test - ignore, Peter O'Leary
• Re: C+S user scenarios, second edition, Don LaVange
  • Re: C+S user scenarios, second edition, Liz Statmore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: C+S user scenarios, second edition, Don LaVange
• C+S user scenarios, Dave Curley
  • Re: C+S user scenarios, Steve Carter
    • Re: C+S user scenarios, second edition, Steve Carter
      • Re: C+S user scenarios, second edition, Liz Statmore
      • Re: C+S user scenarios, second edition, Steve Carter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: C+S user scenarios, Don LaVange
• A minimal set of objects and transactions, Anik Ganguly
  • Re: A minimal set of objects and transactions, Steve Carter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A minimal set of objects and transactions, Don LaVange
  • Re: A minimal set of objects and transactions, Robert Moskowitz
  • Re: A minimal set of objects and transactions, Dave Curley
    • Re: A minimal set of objects and transactions, Steve Carter
• Proposed charter, Anik Ganguly
  • Re: Proposed charter, Liz Statmore
  • Re: Proposed charter, Steve Carter
  • Re: Proposed charter, J. Scott Benson
  • Re: Proposed charter, Dave Crocker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Proposed charter, Don LaVange
  • Re: Proposed charter, Robert Moskowitz
  • Re: Proposed charter, Don LaVange
  • Proposed Charter, Stephen R Hanna
  • RE: Proposed charter, Alec Dun
• Freetime Lookup, Denis BIGORGNE
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Freetime Lookup -Reply, Steve Carter
  • Re: Freetime Lookup -Reply, Don LaVange
    • Re: Freetime Lookup -Reply, Steve Carter
  • Re: Freetime Lookup -Reply, Don LaVange
• Object Format issues, Stephen R Hanna
• C&S Overview, Peter O'Leary
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • C&S Overview -Reply, Steve Carter
  • RE: C&S Overview -Reply, Lewis Geer
  • Re: C&S Overview, Stephen R Hanna
    • Re: C&S Overview, Peter O'Leary
• RE: Cool Features - Was: (Re: Examples Are Somewhat Confusing), Alec Dun
  • Re: Cool Features - Was: (Re: Examples Are Somewhat Confusing), Peter O'Leary
    • Re: Cool Features - Was: (Re: Examples Are Somewhat Confusing), Tim Howes
      • Re: Cool Features - Was: (Re: Examples Are Somewhat Confusing), Skip Montanaro
• Architectural issues, Stephen R Hanna

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.