Archive of ietf-calendar, by date

• Re: CAP TODO: Stored queries., George Babics, 11/20/2001
• Re: CAP TODO: mimium componet properties, George Babics, 11/20/2001
• Re: CAP TODO: UID, George Babics, 11/20/2001
• Re: CAP DODO: VQUERY - partial access, George Babics, 11/20/2001
• Re: CAP TODO: undefined properties, George Babics, 11/20/2001
• Re: CAP TODO: MITM, George Babics, 11/20/2001
• Re: CAP: search ABNF sql-min, Martijn van Beers, 11/20/2001
• Re: CAP: VCAR - limiting READ, John Stracke, 11/19/2001
• CAP: storing new components, Doug Royer, 11/19/2001
• CAP: PRODID capability, Doug Royer, 11/19/2001
• CAP: search ABNF sql-min, Doug Royer, 11/19/2001
• CAP: VCAR - limiting READ, Doug Royer, 11/19/2001
• CAP: DEFAULT_VCARS, Doug Royer, 11/19/2001
• CAP: typo 2.4.4.2, Doug Royer, 11/19/2001
• Re: Specify LANG values., Doug Royer, 11/16/2001
• Re: Server replies to CREATE, Doug Royer, 11/16/2001
• Re: Specify LANG values., John Stracke, 11/16/2001
• Re: Creating new components, Steve Mansour, 11/16/2001
• Re: Server replies to CREATE, Steve Mansour, 11/16/2001
• Re: CAPABILITY/ITIPVERSION., Steve Mansour, 11/16/2001
• RE: Specify LANG values., Shannon J. Clark, 11/16/2001
• Re: [EDITORS NOTE: John Stracke to review..., John Stracke, 11/16/2001
• [EDITORS NOTE: John Stracke to review..., Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• Uniqueness of RELCALID, Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• Specify LANG values., Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• CHILDREN calendar attribute and comma., Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• Delete old information., Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• Typo - wrap., Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• DECLINECOUNTER: missing text, Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• COUNTER: missing text, Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• ADD: mising text., Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• REPLY - missing text., Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• REQUEST - wrong text, Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• iTIP restriction tables in CAP, Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• READ - include readable properties?, Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• From MOVE [EDITORS NOTE..., Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• Missing errno number and text, Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• MODIFY - eliminate unneeded data., Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• Re: ALARMID to VALARM after stored?, Steve Mansour, 11/15/2001
• MODIFY missing error numbers., Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• DELETE restriction table - QUERYNAME/QUERY, Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• Re: ALARMID to VALARM after stored?, Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• Re: Wildcard for componet name., John Stracke, 11/15/2001
• CMDID required in reply if supplied in command, Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• Method missing from example and text., Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• Re: CAP TODO: single threaded, Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• OK, then Re: CAP TODO: single threaded], John Stracke, 11/15/2001
• Wildcard for componet name., Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• SQL-MIN fix, Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• Minor Search issues, Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• Re: ALARMID to VALARM after stored?, Bernard Desruisseaux, 11/15/2001
• PIPELINE and bound latency, Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• VCAR - ordering, Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• MOVE issue., Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• Re: MODIFY restriction table..., Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• Re: CAP TODO: single threaded, John Stracke, 11/15/2001
• Re: CAP TODO: single threaded, Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• Re: CAP TODO: single threaded, Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• Re: ALARMID to VALARM after stored?, Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• Re: CAPABILITY/ITIPVERSION., Doug Royer, 11/15/2001
• Some recent internationalization drafts, Bob Mahoney, 11/15/2001
• Re: CAP TODO: single threaded, Bruce_Kahn, 11/15/2001
• Re: CAP TODO: single threaded, Bruce_Kahn, 11/15/2001
• Re: CAP TODO - CRISP, John Stracke, 11/15/2001
• Re: CAP TODO: single threaded, John Stracke, 11/15/2001
• Re: ALARMID to VALARM after stored?, Steve Mansour, 11/14/2001
• Re: CAPABILITY/ITIPVERSION., Steve Mansour, 11/14/2001
• Re: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), Steve Mansour, 11/14/2001
• Re: Posts missing/dropped (again), pregen, 11/14/2001
• MODIFY restriction table..., Doug Royer, 11/14/2001
• From CAP DELETE..., Doug Royer, 11/14/2001
• RE: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Propo sed Standard, Hollenbeck, Scott, 11/14/2001
• Creating new components, Doug Royer, 11/14/2001
• CREATE calendar - confused., Doug Royer, 11/14/2001
• Server replies to CREATE, Doug Royer, 11/14/2001
• ALARMID to VALARM after stored?, Doug Royer, 11/14/2001
• CAPABILITY/ITIPVERSION., Doug Royer, 11/14/2001
• RE: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), Shannon J. Clark, 11/14/2001
• Re: Posts missing/dropped (again), Doug Royer, 11/14/2001
• Re: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), Doug Royer, 11/14/2001
• Re: CAP TODO - CRISP, Doug Royer, 11/14/2001
• Re: CAP TODO: single threaded, Doug Royer, 11/14/2001
• Re: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Proposed Standard, Doug Royer, 11/14/2001
• Posts missing/dropped (again), Bruce_Kahn, 11/14/2001
• Re: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), John Stracke, 11/12/2001
• Re: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), Robert_Ransdell, 11/12/2001
• Fw: Re: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), Robert_Ransdell, 11/12/2001
• Re: CAP TODO - CRISP, John Stracke, 11/12/2001
• Re: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), John Stracke, 11/12/2001
• Re: CAP TODO: single threaded, John Stracke, 11/12/2001
• Re: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Proposed Standard, John Stracke, 11/12/2001
• Re: Synchronization issues, Benjamin Sonntag, 11/11/2001
• RE: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Propo sed Standard, Hollenbeck, Scott, 11/10/2001
• RE: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Propo sed Standard, Dawson Frank (NMP/Irving), 11/10/2001
• RE: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Propo sed Standard, Hollenbeck, Scott, 11/10/2001
• RE: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Propo sed Standard, Dawson Frank (NMP/Irving), 11/10/2001
• Re: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Proposed Standard, pregen, 11/10/2001
• RE: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Propo sed Standard, Hollenbeck, Scott, 11/10/2001
• Synchronization issues, Steve Miller, 11/10/2001
• Re: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), Steve Mansour, 11/09/2001
• Re: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...) + iCalendar as data standard, Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• Re: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• Re: CAP TODO: single threaded, Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• Re: CAP TODO - CRISP, Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• RE: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...) + iCalendar as data standard, Shannon J. Clark, 11/09/2001
• Re: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), John Stracke, 11/09/2001
• Re: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Proposed Standard, Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• Re: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Proposed Standard, Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• Re: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Proposed Standard, John Stracke, 11/09/2001
• Re: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• Re: CAP TODO: single threaded, John Stracke, 11/09/2001
• Re: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• Re: CAP TODO: NOOP - from authenticated., John Stracke, 11/09/2001
• Re: CAP TODO - CRISP, John Stracke, 11/09/2001
• Re: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• Re: CAP TODO: disconnect, John Stracke, 11/09/2001
• Re: CAP TODO: autologout disconnect notification, John Stracke, 11/09/2001
• Re: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...) + iCalendar as data standard, Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• Re: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• Re: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• Re: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• CAP TODO: undefined properties, Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• CAP TODO: mimium componet properties, Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• CAP DODO: VQUERY - partial access, Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• CAP TODO: NOOP - from authenticated., Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• CAP TODO: decreed VCARS, Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• CAP TODO: Stored queries., Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• CAP TODO: anonymous MUST, Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• CAP TODO: MITM, Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• CAP TODO: single threaded, Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• CAP TODO: autologout disconnect notification, Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• CAP TODO: Digest, Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• CAP TODO: UID, Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• CAP TODO - CRISP, Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• CAP TODO: disconnect, Doug Royer, 11/09/2001
• Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Proposed Standard, pregen, 11/09/2001
• RE: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), John Stracke, 11/09/2001
• RE: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), Shannon J. Clark, 11/09/2001
• RE: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), John Stracke, 11/09/2001
• RE: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), Shannon J. Clark, 11/08/2001
• Re: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), Steve Mansour, 11/08/2001
• RE: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...) + iCalendar as data standard, Shannon J. Clark, 11/08/2001
• RE: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), Shannon J. Clark, 11/08/2001
• RE: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), John Stracke, 11/08/2001
• RE: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), Shannon J. Clark, 11/08/2001
• SV: logical model of reoccurrence, Greg FitzPatrick, 11/08/2001
• Re: logical model of reoccurrence, pregen, 11/08/2001
• logical model of reoccurrence, Greg FitzPatrick, 11/08/2001
• Re: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...), Doug Royer, 11/07/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, Bruce_Kahn, 11/06/2001
• CAP: New Interim Version, George Babics, 11/06/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, Doug Royer, 11/05/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, John Stracke, 11/05/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, Bruce_Kahn, 11/05/2001
• Re: CAP: Filing of components, Doug Royer, 11/02/2001
• Re: CAP: Filing of components, Bernard Desruisseaux, 11/02/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, Doug Royer, 11/02/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, Doug Royer, 11/02/2001
• Re: DATE values question, Doug Royer, 11/02/2001
• Re: What should the xCal tag names case be?, John Stracke, 11/02/2001
• Re: What should the xCal tag names case be?, Gary Frederick, 11/02/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, John Stracke, 11/02/2001
• Re: CAP: encrypted MIME, Graham Gilmore, 11/02/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, Bruce_Kahn, 11/02/2001
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-inetcal-guide-02.txt, Internet-Drafts, 11/02/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, John Stracke, 11/01/2001
• Re: DATE values question, Damon Chaplin, 11/01/2001
• Re: 2445:4.1 (x-name) is misleading., Bruce_Kahn, 11/01/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, Bruce_Kahn, 11/01/2001
• RE: DATE values question, Shannon J. Clark, 11/01/2001
• Re: DATE values question, Bruce_Kahn, 11/01/2001
• Fw: DATE values question --- OOPS 5 DAYS, Robert_Ransdell, 11/01/2001
• Fw: DATE values question, Robert_Ransdell, 11/01/2001
• RE: CAP: Filing of components, Shannon J. Clark, 11/01/2001
• Re: CAP: Filing of components, Bernard Desruisseaux, 11/01/2001
• RE: What should the xCal tag names case be?, NITSCH,FRANK (HP-Germany,ex1), 10/30/2001
• RE: Events schema (fwd), Libby Miller, 10/30/2001
• Re: Issues list - CAP Oct 29th, 2001, ned+ietf-calendar, 10/29/2001
• RE: Issues list - CAP Oct 29th, 2001, Shannon J. Clark, 10/29/2001
• Re: Issues list - CAP Oct 29th, 2001, George Babics, 10/29/2001
• Re: Issues list - CAP Oct 29th, 2001, George Babics, 10/29/2001
• RE: Issues list - CAP Oct 29th, 2001, Shannon J. Clark, 10/29/2001
• Re: Issues list - CAP Oct 29th, 2001, George Babics, 10/29/2001
• issues List - iCalendar (RFC 2445) Oct 29th 2001, Shannon J. Clark, 10/29/2001
• Issues List - iTIP Oct 29th, 2001, Shannon J. Clark, 10/29/2001
• Issues list - iMIP Oct 29th, 2001, Shannon J. Clark, 10/29/2001
• Issues list - CAP Oct 29th, 2001, Shannon J. Clark, 10/29/2001
• Issues List - General CALSCH issues, Shannon J. Clark, 10/29/2001
• XML Basics reference, Shannon J. Clark, 10/29/2001
• DATE values question, Damon Chaplin, 10/28/2001
• Re: Discussion on Calendaring in other forums, pregen, 10/28/2001
• RE: XML iCal draft changes, Eric R. Plamondon, 10/27/2001
• RE: How does each standard "fit" together, Shannon J. Clark, 10/26/2001
• Re: How does each standard "fit" together, Doug Royer, 10/26/2001
• Re: Discussion on Calendaring in other forums, Doug Royer, 10/26/2001
• Re: How does each standard "fit" together, Doug Royer, 10/26/2001
• Re: XML iCal draft changes, Doug Royer, 10/26/2001
• Re: XML iCal draft changes, Doug Royer, 10/26/2001
• Re: XML iCal draft changes, Doug Royer, 10/26/2001
• RE: How does each standard "fit" together, John Stracke, 10/26/2001
• RE: How does each standard "fit" together, Shannon J. Clark, 10/26/2001
• Discussion on Calendaring in other forums, Shannon J. Clark, 10/26/2001
• Re: How does each standard "fit" together, John Stracke, 10/26/2001
• RE: XML iCal draft changes, John Stracke, 10/26/2001
• RE: XML iCal draft changes, Dawson Frank (NMP/Irving), 10/26/2001
• RE: XML iCal draft changes, Eric R. Plamondon, 10/26/2001
• How does each standard "fit" together, Shannon J. Clark, 10/25/2001
• Issues List - request for issues, Shannon J. Clark, 10/25/2001
• RE: XML iCal draft changes, John Stracke, 10/25/2001
• RE: XML iCal draft changes, Dawson Frank (NMP/Irving), 10/25/2001
• RE: XML iCal draft changes, John Stracke, 10/25/2001
• RE: What should the xCal tag names case be?, John Stracke, 10/25/2001
• RE: XML iCal draft changes, Dawson Frank (NMP/Irving), 10/25/2001
• RE: What should the xCal tag names case be?, Dawson Frank (NMP/Irving), 10/25/2001
• Re: MIME type in draft-ietf-calsch-many-xcal-00.txt, Murata Makoto, 10/22/2001
• RE: MIME type in draft-ietf-calsch-many-xcal-00.txt, Dawson Frank (NMP/Irving), 10/22/2001
• RE: XML iCal draft changes, NITSCH,FRANK (HP-Germany,ex1), 10/22/2001
• Re: Email Archive at IMC website, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 10/19/2001
• Re: Email Archive at IMC website, pregen, 10/18/2001
• Re: Email Archive at IMC website, John Stracke, 10/18/2001
• RE: CalConnectIII update, pregen, 10/18/2001
• Re: Email Archive at IMC website, Bruce_Kahn, 10/18/2001
• Email Archive at IMC website, Shannon J. Clark, 10/18/2001
• RE: CalConnectIII update, Shannon J. Clark, 10/18/2001
• CalConnectIII update, pregen, 10/17/2001
• CAP: CAP and BEEP [Was: Re: BEEP Protocol and Internationalization: Interim meeting?], George Babics, 10/16/2001
• Heidi Wulkow/CHI/Lotus is out of the office., Heidi_Wulkow, 10/15/2001
• Heidi Wulkow/CHI/Lotus is out of the office., Heidi_Wulkow, 10/15/2001
• SENT-BY / cal-address - we forgot to update., Doug Royer, 10/15/2001
• Re: CAP: Filing of components, Doug Royer, 10/15/2001
• Re: XML iCal draft changes, Doug Royer, 10/15/2001
• RE: MIME type in draft-ietf-calsch-many-xcal-00.txt, Robert_Ransdell, 10/15/2001
• What should the xCal tag names case be?, Gary Frederick, 10/15/2001
• Re: XML iCal draft changes, Gary Frederick, 10/15/2001
• Re: XML iCal draft changes, Gary Frederick, 10/15/2001
• RE: MIME type in draft-ietf-calsch-many-xcal-00.txt, Eric R. Plamondon, 10/15/2001
• Re: XML iCal draft changes, Doug Royer, 10/12/2001
• MIME type in draft-ietf-calsch-many-xcal-00.txt, Dan Kohn, 10/12/2001
• RE-submission of iCalendar XML DTD draft, pregen, 10/12/2001
• XML iCal draft changes, Greg FitzPatrick, 10/12/2001
• Re: XML iCal draft changes, Libby Miller, 10/12/2001
• XML iCal draft changes, Eric R. Plamondon, 10/12/2001
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-many-xcal-00.txt, Internet-Drafts, 10/12/2001
• Re: CAP: Filing of components, Bernard Desruisseaux, 10/10/2001
• Re: Specifying RRULE UNTIL parameter for events using DATE or floatingtimes, Doug Royer, 10/10/2001
• Re: Specifying RRULE UNTIL parameter for events using DATE or floatingtimes, Damon Chaplin, 10/09/2001
• Re: CAP: Filing of components, Doug Royer, 10/08/2001
• Re: Specifying RRULE UNTIL parameter for events using DATE or floatingtimes, Doug Royer, 10/08/2001
• Specifying RRULE UNTIL parameter for events using DATE or floating times, Damon Chaplin, 10/05/2001
• CAP: Filing of components, Bernard Desruisseaux, 10/05/2001
• RE: CalConnect III information, Dawson Frank (NMP/Irving), 09/26/2001
• CalConnect III information, pregen, 09/26/2001
• Re: CAP Database, George Babics, 09/25/2001
• CAP Database, Karen Chu, 09/25/2001
• Re: CAP: CALIDEXPAND and UPNEXPAND are they needed?, George Babics, 09/25/2001
• Re: CAP: VCALENDAR Overloading., George Babics, 09/25/2001
• Re: BYDAY & broken VTIMEZONE-RRULE examples?, Damon Chaplin, 09/21/2001
• Reefknot iCalendar Bootstrap Guide, release 1.0, srl, 09/20/2001
• CAP: VCALENDAR Overloading., Patrice Lapierre, 09/20/2001
• CAP: CALIDEXPAND and UPNEXPAND are they needed?, Patrice Lapierre, 09/20/2001
• Updated Version Of CAP, George Babics, 09/17/2001
• iCal - SkiCal - iptel, Greg FitzPatrick, 09/07/2001
• Re: major inconsistancy in RFC 2445, Graham Gilmore, 09/06/2001
• Re: BYDAY & broken VTIMEZONE-RRULE examples?, Jonathan Lennox, 09/06/2001
• major inconsistancy in RFC 2445, Greg FitzPatrick, 09/06/2001
• Re: major inconsistancy in RFC 2445, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09/06/2001
• Re: BYDAY & broken VTIMEZONE-RRULE examples?, David L. Nicol, 09/06/2001
• major inconsistancy in RFC 2445, Greg FitzPatrick, 09/06/2001
• BYDAY & broken VTIMEZONE-RRULE examples?, Graham Gilmore, 09/05/2001
• request for comment on OpTimeSet, Greg FitzPatrick, 09/05/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, John Stracke, 08/30/2001
• RE: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, Shannon J. Clark, 08/28/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, John Stracke, 08/28/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, Steve Mansour, 08/28/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, John Stracke, 08/28/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, Steve Mansour, 08/27/2001
• Re: CAP: MUST anonymous auth?, John Stracke, 08/27/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, John Stracke, 08/27/2001
• Re: event notification ((was Re: CAP: autologout, David L. Nicol, 08/24/2001
• Re: event notification ((was Re: CAP: autologout, Lawrence Greenfield, 08/24/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, Alexander Taler, 08/23/2001
• event notification ((was Re: CAP: autologout, David L. Nicol, 08/23/2001
• Re: CAP: moving components, David L. Nicol, 08/23/2001
• Re: CAP: moving components, George Babics, 08/23/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, George Babics, 08/23/2001
• Re: CAP: commands need definitions, not just examples, George Babics, 08/23/2001
• Re: CAP: stored queries, George Babics, 08/23/2001
• Re: CAP: these are not legal iCalendar objects, George Babics, 08/23/2001
• Re: CAP: changes needed for CRISP, George Babics, 08/23/2001
• Re: CAP: MUST anonymous auth?, George Babics, 08/23/2001
• Re: CAP: why does a calendar have a TZID?, David L. Nicol, 08/22/2001
• Re: CAP: why does a calendar have a TZID?, John Stracke, 08/22/2001
• Re: CAP: why does a calendar have a TZID?, David L. Nicol, 08/22/2001
• Re: CALSCH meeting minutes - London, pregen, 08/22/2001
• Re: CALSCH meeting minutes - London, John Stracke, 08/22/2001
• Re: CAP: Bounded latency, John Stracke, 08/22/2001
• Re: CAP: autologout, John Stracke, 08/22/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, John Stracke, 08/22/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, David L. Nicol, 08/21/2001
• Re: CAP: Bounded latency, David L. Nicol, 08/21/2001
• Re: CAP: autologout, David L. Nicol, 08/21/2001
• Re: CAP: matching common names, David L. Nicol, 08/21/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, David L. Nicol, 08/21/2001
• Authorization Certificates Are All Around Us, David L. Nicol, 08/21/2001
• CalConnect III, pregen, 08/21/2001
• CALSCH meeting minutes - London, pregen, 08/21/2001
• Re: CAP: SASL mechanisms and MITM attacks, John Stracke, 08/21/2001
• Re: CAP: SASL mechanisms and MITM attacks, George Babics, 08/21/2001
• Re: CAP: why does a calendar have a TZID?, John Stracke, 08/21/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, John Stracke, 08/21/2001
• RFC2445 - VALARM with DURATION or REPEAT?, Natasha Sainty, 08/21/2001
• Re: CAP: cancelling authentication, David L. Nicol, 08/20/2001
• Re: CAP: why does a calendar have a TZID?, David L. Nicol, 08/20/2001
• Re: CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, David L. Nicol, 08/20/2001
• Re: CAP: IDENTIFY seems dangerous, David L. Nicol, 08/20/2001
• Re: CAP: Bounded latency, John Stracke, 08/20/2001
• Re: CAP: autologout, John Stracke, 08/20/2001
• Re: CAP: matching common names, John Stracke, 08/20/2001
• Re: CAP: why define Resource Calendar?, John Stracke, 08/20/2001
• Re: CAP: error code 6.9 leaks data, George Babics, 08/19/2001
• Re: CAP: Bounded latency, George Babics, 08/19/2001
• Re: CAP: autologout, George Babics, 08/19/2001
• Re: CAP: matching common names, George Babics, 08/18/2001
• Re: CAP: things that are out of scope, George Babics, 08/18/2001
• Re: CAP: man-in-the-middle attacks, George Babics, 08/18/2001
• Re: CAP: why define Resource Calendar?, George Babics, 08/18/2001
• Re: CAP: OWNER of a CS?, George Babics, 08/18/2001
• Re: CAP: inconsistency in Overlapped Booking definition, George Babics, 08/18/2001
• Re: CAP: why 2 ways to organize calendars?, George Babics, 08/18/2001
• Re: The iCalendar XML DTD, Gary Frederick, 08/17/2001
• Re: The iCalendar XML DTD, bpapkin, 08/17/2001
• RE: The iCalendar XML DTD, NITSCH,FRANK (HP-Germany,ex1), 08/17/2001
• Re: Proposed change to iCal (was RE: Adding more unique identifiers), Roger D, 08/16/2001
• Re: Proposed change to iCal (was RE: Adding more unique identifiers), Roger D, 08/16/2001
• Re: CAP: cancelling authentication, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• Re: 2445:4.1 (x-name) is misleading., John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• Re: CAP: cancelling authentication, Lawrence Greenfield, 08/16/2001
• Re: CAP: SASL mechanisms and MITM attacks, Lawrence Greenfield, 08/16/2001
• Re: The iCalendar XML DTD, Alan Davies, 08/16/2001
• CAP: implications of fanout, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: nits, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: deferring response to REFRESH?, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: Item Registration Considered Harmful, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: why does a calendar have a TZID?, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: let's not copy text, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: "iTIP message queued too long", John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: order of processing iTIP messages, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: moving components, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: why do we need GENERATEUID?, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: commands need definitions, not just examples, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: stored queries, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: these are not legal iCalendar objects, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: changes needed for CRISP, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: MUST anonymous auth?, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: cancelling authentication, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: SASL mechanisms and MITM attacks, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: error code 6.9 leaks data, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: Bounded latency, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: autologout, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: IDENTIFY seems dangerous, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: no ordering on GRANT/DENY?, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: matching common names, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: things that are out of scope, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: man-in-the-middle attacks, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: why define Resource Calendar?, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: OWNER of a CS?, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: inconsistency in Overlapped Booking definition, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• CAP: why 2 ways to organize calendars?, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• Re: The iCalendar XML DTD, Gary Frederick, 08/16/2001
• The iCalendar XML DTD, Leveille,Peter S., 08/16/2001
• RE: 2445:4.1 (x-name) is misleading., Shannon J. Clark, 08/16/2001
• CAP: UG expansion?, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• RE: The iCalendar XML DTD, David King, 08/16/2001
• Re: 2445:4.1 (x-name) is misleading., Pär Lannerö, 08/16/2001
• Re: The iCalendar XML DTD, Alan Davies, 08/16/2001
• Re: The iCalendar XML DTD, John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• Re: 2445:4.1 (x-name) is misleading., John Stracke, 08/16/2001
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-crisp-01.txt, Internet-Drafts, 08/16/2001
• 2445:4.1 (x-name) is misleading., David L. Nicol, 08/15/2001
• Minor Updates to iCalednar Issues and Draft, Eric Busboom, 08/15/2001
• Upaded Links On calsch.org, George Babics, 08/15/2001
• Updated CRISP document, John Stracke, 08/15/2001
• Re: Proposed change to iCal (was RE: Adding more unique identifiers), Alan Davies, 08/15/2001
• Re: Proposed change to iCal (was RE: Adding more unique identifiers), John Stracke, 08/15/2001
• Re: Proposed change to iCal (was RE: Adding more unique identifiers), Roger D, 08/14/2001
• Question and/or suggestion, Shannon J. Clark, 08/14/2001
• Re: CPL: Summary of what it is, David L. Nicol, 08/14/2001
• Re: CPL: Summary of what it is, John Stracke, 08/14/2001
• Re: CPL: Summary of what it is, John Stracke, 08/14/2001
• Re: BEEP Protocol and Internationalization: Interim meeting?, Bob Mahoney, 08/14/2001
• BEEP Protocol and Internationalization: Interim meeting?, Bob Mahoney, 08/14/2001
• Re: CPL: Summary of what it is, David L. Nicol, 08/13/2001
• Re: CPL: Summary of what it is, John Stracke, 08/13/2001
• Re: CPL: Summary of what it is, Jonathan Lennox, 08/13/2001
• Re: CPL: Summary of what it is, John Stracke, 08/13/2001
• RE: CPL: Summary of what it is, Bob Mahoney, 08/13/2001
• RE: CPL: Summary of what it is, Jonathan Rosenberg, 08/12/2001
• Re: CPL: Summary of what it is, David L. Nicol, 08/10/2001
• Re: UTF-8 considerations, Lawrence Greenfield, 08/09/2001
• Re: UTF-8 considerations, John Stracke, 08/09/2001
• Re: UTF-8 considerations, Lawrence Greenfield, 08/09/2001
• Re: UTF-8 considerations, John Stracke, 08/09/2001
• Re: CPL: Summary of what it is, Henning Schulzrinne, 08/09/2001
• UTF-8 considerations, Paul B. Hill, 08/09/2001
• Re: CPL: Summary of what it is, John Stracke, 08/09/2001
• Re: CPL: Summary of what it is, Henning Schulzrinne, 08/09/2001
• Re: CPL: Summary of what it is, Henning Schulzrinne, 08/09/2001
• Re: CPL: Summary of what it is, John Stracke, 08/09/2001
• Re: CPL: Summary of what it is, John Stracke, 08/09/2001
• Re: CPL: Summary of what it is, John Stracke, 08/09/2001
• Re: Additional RECAP and status of CPL RECUR Issues., David L. Nicol, 08/08/2001
• RE: Additional RECAP and status of CPL RECUR Issues., Shannon J. Clark, 08/08/2001
• Re: Additional RECAP and status of CPL RECUR Issues., David L. Nicol, 08/08/2001
• Re: BYSETPOS: Fresh start, Jonathan Lennox, 08/08/2001
• CPL: Summary of what it is, Jonathan Lennox, 08/08/2001
• Applogies..., Bruce_Kahn, 08/08/2001
• RE: CAP Issue: Decreed VCARs, Paul B. Hill, 08/08/2001
• Re: CAP Issue: Decreed VCARs, Steve Mansour, 08/08/2001
• Re: Proposed change to iCal (was RE: Adding more unique identifiers), John Stracke, 08/08/2001
• RE: CAP Issue: Decreed VCARs, Paul B. Hill, 08/08/2001
• Re: CAP Issue: Decreed VCARs, David L. Nicol, 08/07/2001
• Re: Proposed change to iCal (was RE: Adding more unique identifiers), Bob Mahoney, 08/07/2001
• Re: CAP Issue: Decreed VCARs, Steve Mansour, 08/07/2001
• RE: CAP Issue: Decreed VCARs, Paul B. Hill, 08/07/2001
• RE: CAP issue: Fallback/fanout to iTIP, Paul B. Hill, 08/07/2001
• Monday Night dinner, pregen, 08/06/2001
• Re: FW: IETF date/time draft in last call, John Stracke, 08/06/2001
• RE: 51st IETF - Calendaring and Scheduling WG (CALSCH), pregen, 08/06/2001
• RE: 51st IETF - Calendaring and Scheduling WG (CALSCH), Greg FitzPatrick, 08/04/2001
• Re: CAP issue: Fallback/fanout to iTIP, David L. Nicol, 08/01/2001
• FW: IETF date/time draft in last call, Greg FitzPatrick, 08/01/2001
• Re: Monday night dinner?, John Stracke, 07/31/2001
• Re: Monday night dinner?, Bob Mahoney, 07/31/2001
• Monday night dinner?, John Stracke, 07/31/2001
• Re: CAP issue: Fallback/fanout to iTIP, Steve Mansour, 07/30/2001
• Re: CAP Issue: Decreed VCARs, Steve Mansour, 07/30/2001
• Re: CAP issue: Fallback/fanout to iTIP, John Stracke, 07/30/2001
• Re: CAP Issue: Decreed VCARs, George Babics, 07/30/2001
• Re: CAP issue: Fallback/fanout to iTIP, John Stracke, 07/30/2001
• Re: CAP issue: Fallback/fanout to iTIP, Steve Mansour, 07/30/2001
• Re: CAP issue: Fallback/fanout to iTIP, George Babics, 07/30/2001
• Re: CAP issue: Fallback/fanout to iTIP, John Stracke, 07/30/2001
• Re: CAP issue: Fallback/fanout to iTIP, Steve Mansour, 07/29/2001
• Re: CAP issue: Fallback/fanout to iTIP, Martijn van Beers, 07/29/2001
• Re: CAP issue: Fallback/fanout to iTIP, Steve Mansour, 07/28/2001
• Re: CAP issue: Fallback/fanout to iTIP, Steve Mansour, 07/28/2001
• Re: CAP issue: Fallback/fanout to iTIP, Martijn van Beers, 07/28/2001
• Status of CAP issues, Steve Mansour, 07/28/2001
• Re: CAP issue: Fallback/fanout to iTIP, Steve Mansour, 07/28/2001
• Re: BYSETPOS: Fresh start, Thomas O'Dowd, 07/27/2001
• Re: Additional RECAP and status of CPL RECUR Issues., David L. Nicol, 07/27/2001
• RE: Additional RECAP and status of CPL RECUR Issues., Shannon J. Clark, 07/27/2001
• RE: BYSETPOS: Fresh start, Shannon J. Clark, 07/27/2001
• BYSETPOS: Fresh start, Bruce_Kahn, 07/26/2001
• Re: Additional RECAP and status of CPL RECUR Issues., David L. Nicol, 07/26/2001
• RE: Additional RECAP and status of CPL RECUR Issues., Shannon J. Clark, 07/26/2001
• Re: Additional RECAP and status of CPL RECUR Issues., David L. Nicol, 07/26/2001
• Re: Can we fix BYSETPOS?, Bruce_Kahn, 07/26/2001
• Additional RECAP and status of CPL RECUR Issues., Jonathan Lennox, 07/26/2001
• Re: Can we fix BYSETPOS?, Bruce_Kahn, 07/26/2001
• Re: RECAP & Questions of CPL RECUR Issues., Bruce_Kahn, 07/26/2001
• Re: i know you don't want to hear it but, George Babics, 07/26/2001
• Re: i know you don't want to hear it but, John Stracke, 07/26/2001
• Re: i know you don't want to hear it but, Steve Mansour, 07/25/2001
• Re: i know you don't want to hear it but, David L. Nicol, 07/25/2001
• Re: i know you don't want to hear it but, John Stracke, 07/25/2001
• Proposed change to iCal (was RE: Adding more unique identifiers), Roger D, 07/25/2001
• RE: Re: mixing mimedirectory ABNF and XML, Roger D, 07/25/2001
• i know you don't want to hear it but, David L. Nicol, 07/25/2001
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-cap-05.txt, Internet-Drafts, 07/25/2001
• FW: 51st IETF - Calendaring and Scheduling WG (calsch), pregen, 07/24/2001
• Re: AUTHORIZE again, David L. Nicol, 07/23/2001
• Re: AUTHORIZE again, David L. Nicol, 07/23/2001
• Re: AUTHORIZE again, John Stracke, 07/23/2001
• AUTHORIZE again, David L. Nicol, 07/23/2001
• Re: RRULE Question: How to specify weird pattern, Alan Davies, 07/20/2001
• RRULE Question: How to specify weird pattern, John Sun, 07/20/2001
• Updated CAP Draft, George Babics, 07/20/2001
• Re: CAP issue: CS does not preserve data integrity on multipart/signed, John Stracke, 07/20/2001
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-inetcal-guide-01.txt, Internet-Drafts, 07/20/2001
• CAP Issue: Decreed VCARs, Steve Mansour, 07/19/2001
• Re: CAP issue: Fallback/fanout to iTIP, Martijn van Beers, 07/19/2001
• Re: CAP issue: Fallback/fanout to iTIP, Steve Mansour, 07/19/2001
• Re: CAP issue: Fallback/fanout to iTIP, Martijn van Beers, 07/19/2001
• CAP issue: JIT signing/encryption, Steve Mansour, 07/19/2001
• CAP issue: CS does not preserve data integrity on multipart/signed, Steve Mansour, 07/19/2001
• CAP issue: workflow path may not be a true path, Steve Mansour, 07/19/2001
• CAP issue: Fallback/fanout to iTIP, Steve Mansour, 07/19/2001
• Re: Last Call For "Guide To Internet Calendaring", David L. Nicol, 07/18/2001
• Re: CAP - Mutual Trust Model, pregen, 07/18/2001
• Re: mixing mimedirectory ABNF and XML, John Stracke, 07/18/2001
• RE: mixing mimedirectory ABNF and XML, Greg FitzPatrick, 07/18/2001
• Re: mixing mimedirectiory ABNF and XML, John Stracke, 07/18/2001
• mixing mimedirectiory ABNF and XML, Greg FitzPatrick, 07/18/2001
• Last Call For "Guide To Internet Calendaring", George Babics, 07/18/2001
• Re: CAP - Mutual Trust Model, David L. Nicol, 07/17/2001
• Re: CAP - Mutual Trust Model, George Babics, 07/17/2001
• Re: CAP - Mutual Trust Model, John Stracke, 07/17/2001
• CAP - Mutual Trust Model, Steve Mansour, 07/17/2001
• Re: Take two: Where would a SPKI/SDSI authorization certificate go?, David L. Nicol, 07/16/2001

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.