Archive of ietf-calendar, by date

Go to thread index
Go to main page for ietf-calendar

Page 6 of 14
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

Re: COUNTER - and who sent it., Doug Royer, 10/23/2002
Re: Diffs - ftp://royer.com/pub/CALSCH/cap.txt, Andrea Campi, 10/23/2002
Re: [a.campi@xxxxxxx: Question about iTIP + VCARs], Doug Royer, 10/23/2002
Re: [a.campi@xxxxxxx: Another dubious example], Doug Royer, 10/23/2002
Re: 9.5 MODIFY Command, Doug Royer, 10/23/2002
Re: 8.6. VQUERY Component, Doug Royer, 10/23/2002
Re: COUNTER - and who sent it., Bruce_Kahn, 10/23/2002
[a.campi@xxxxxxx: Question about iTIP + VCARs], Andrea Campi, 10/23/2002
Re: Diffs - http://INET-Consulting.com/cap-09-b-2.{txt,html}, Doug Royer, 10/23/2002
[a.campi@xxxxxxx: Another dubious example], Andrea Campi, 10/23/2002
Re: Updated CAL-QUERY, Doug Royer, 10/23/2002
8.6. VQUERY Component , Andrea Campi, 10/23/2002
Re: 1.3. Definitions, Doug Royer, 10/23/2002
Re: Diffs - http://INET-Consulting.com/cap-09-b-2.{txt,html}, pregen, 10/23/2002
Re: Diffs - ftp://royer.com/pub/CALSCH/cap.txt, Bruce_Kahn, 10/23/2002
Re: Updated CAL-QUERY, Bruce_Kahn, 10/23/2002
9.5 MODIFY Command, Andrea Campi, 10/23/2002
1.3. Definitions , Andrea Campi, 10/23/2002
Re: Diffs - http://INET-Consulting.com/cap-09-b-2.{txt,html}, Andrea Campi, 10/23/2002
6.1.1 CAL-QUERY Value Type, Andrea Campi, 10/23/2002
Re: Diffs - http://INET-Consulting.com/cap-09-b-2.{txt,html}, pregen, 10/23/2002
Re: Diffs - http://INET-Consulting.com/cap-09-b-2.{txt,html}, Doug Royer, 10/23/2002
Re: GET-CAPABILITY - reply, Andrea Campi, 10/23/2002
Re: GET-CAPABILITY - reply, Doug Royer, 10/23/2002
Re: Diffs - http://INET-Consulting.com/cap-09-b-2.{txt,html}, Doug Royer, 10/23/2002
Re: Diffs - ftp://royer.com/pub/CALSCH/cap.txt, Gary Frederick, 10/23/2002
Re: GET-CAPABILITY - reply, Andrea Campi, 10/22/2002
Re: Diffs - ftp://royer.com/pub/CALSCH/cap.txt, Doug Royer, 10/22/2002
Re: Diffs - ftp://royer.com/pub/CALSCH/cap.txt, Gary McGath, 10/22/2002
Re: GET-CAPABILITY - reply, Doug Royer, 10/22/2002
Re: GET-CAPABILITY - reply, Andrea Campi, 10/22/2002
Re: COUNTER - and who sent it., Doug Royer, 10/22/2002
GET-CAPABILITY - reply, Doug Royer, 10/22/2002
Re: Diffs - ftp://royer.com/pub/CALSCH/cap.txt, Doug Royer, 10/22/2002
Re: Diffs - ftp://royer.com/pub/CALSCH/cap.txt, Andrea Campi, 10/22/2002
Re: COUNTER - and who sent it., Bruce_Kahn, 10/22/2002
RE: ATT-COUNTER added to CAP, Ken Crawford, 10/22/2002
ATT-COUNTER added to CAP, Doug Royer, 10/21/2002
Draft cutoff, pregen, 10/21/2002
Error codes && action items, Doug Royer, 10/20/2002
Updated CAL-QUERY, Doug Royer, 10/20/2002
Diffs - ftp://royer.com/pub/CALSCH/cap.txt, Doug Royer, 10/20/2002
Sosigenes 1.0P3, Gary McGath, 10/14/2002
COUNTER - and who sent it., Doug Royer, 10/13/2002
Re: Linked calendars, Doug Royer, 10/10/2002
Linked calendars, Gary McGath, 10/10/2002
Re: Revised proposal, Andrea Campi, 10/03/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Andrea Campi, 10/03/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Bruce_Kahn, 10/02/2002
Re: Revised proposal, Bruce_Kahn, 10/02/2002
Next version of CAP.TXT, Doug Royer, 09/30/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Doug Royer, 09/27/2002
Re: Multipart a MUST or a SHOULD [Was: Re: Proposal about multipart etc], Gary Frederick, 09/27/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, George Babics, 09/26/2002
Re: Multipart a MUST or a SHOULD [Was: Re: Proposal about multipart etc], George Babics, 09/26/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Doug Royer, 09/26/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Andrea Campi, 09/26/2002
Re: Multipart a MUST or a SHOULD [Was: Re: Proposal about multipart etc], Andrea Campi, 09/26/2002
Re: Multipart a MUST or a SHOULD [Was: Re: Proposal about multipart etc], Doug Royer, 09/26/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, George Babics, 09/26/2002
Multipart a MUST or a SHOULD [Was: Re: Proposal about multipart etc], George Babics, 09/26/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, George Babics, 09/26/2002
RDF calendar workshop, Bristol, UK, 2002-10-09, Libby Miller, 09/26/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Doug Royer, 09/25/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Doug Royer, 09/25/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Doug Royer, 09/25/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Doug Royer, 09/25/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Bruce_Kahn, 09/25/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Bruce_Kahn, 09/25/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Bruce_Kahn, 09/25/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Bruce_Kahn, 09/25/2002
Re: Revised proposal, Gary Frederick, 09/20/2002
Re: Revised proposal, George Babics, 09/20/2002
Re: iMIP, Andrea Campi, 09/19/2002
Re: iMIP, Doug Royer, 09/19/2002
Re: Revised proposal, Andrea Campi, 09/19/2002
Re: iMIP, Andrea Campi, 09/19/2002
Re: iMIP, Andrea Campi, 09/19/2002
Re: iMIP, Doug Royer, 09/19/2002
Re: iMIP, Doug Royer, 09/19/2002
Re: Revised proposal, Doug Royer, 09/19/2002
iMIP, Andrea Campi, 09/18/2002
Re: Revised proposal, Andrea Campi, 09/18/2002
Re: Revised proposal, Doug Royer, 09/18/2002
Re: Revised proposal, Andrea Campi, 09/18/2002
Re: Revised proposal, Doug Royer, 09/18/2002
Re: Revised proposal, George Babics, 09/18/2002
Re: Revised proposal, Andrea Campi, 09/18/2002
Re: Revised proposal, Andrea Campi, 09/18/2002
Re: Revised proposal, Doug Royer, 09/17/2002
RE: Revised proposal, Shannon J. Clark, 09/17/2002
Re: Revised proposal, Doug Royer, 09/17/2002
Re: Revised proposal, Andrea Campi, 09/17/2002
Re: Revised proposal, Doug Royer, 09/17/2002
Re: Revised proposal, George Babics, 09/17/2002
Revised proposal, Andrea Campi, 09/17/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Doug Royer, 09/16/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Bruce_Kahn, 09/16/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, George Babics, 09/16/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Doug Royer, 09/13/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, George Babics, 09/13/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Doug Royer, 09/12/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Doug Royer, 09/12/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Doug Royer, 09/12/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Bruce_Kahn, 09/12/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Bruce_Kahn, 09/12/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Bruce_Kahn, 09/12/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Bruce_Kahn, 09/12/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Bruce_Kahn, 09/12/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Doug Royer, 09/12/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Bruce_Kahn, 09/12/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Andrea Campi, 09/12/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Andrea Campi, 09/12/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Bruce_Kahn, 09/12/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Doug Royer, 09/12/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Doug Royer, 09/12/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Andrea Campi, 09/12/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Andrea Campi, 09/12/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Doug Royer, 09/12/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Doug Royer, 09/12/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Doug Royer, 09/12/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, pregen, 09/12/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, George Babics, 09/12/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], George Babics, 09/12/2002
Selection of parameters in CAP-QL (was: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments]), Patrice Lapierre, 09/12/2002
Re: Proposal about multipart etc, Gary Frederick, 09/11/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Doug Royer, 09/11/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Doug Royer, 09/11/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Patrice Lapierre, 09/11/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Bruce_Kahn, 09/11/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Bruce_Kahn, 09/11/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 09/11/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Doug Royer, 09/11/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/11/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/11/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], George Babics, 09/11/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/11/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], George Babics, 09/11/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/11/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/11/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/11/2002
Proposal about multipart etc, Andrea Campi, 09/11/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Gary Frederick, 09/11/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Andrea Campi, 09/11/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Andrea Campi, 09/11/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Graham Gilmore, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Bruce_Kahn, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 09/10/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Doug Royer, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Bruce_Kahn, 09/10/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Doug Royer, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Graham Gilmore, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Bruce_Kahn, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 09/10/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], George Babics, 09/10/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], George Babics, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/10/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Bruce_Kahn, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Bruce_Kahn, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, George Babics, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 09/10/2002
Re: [Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], Doug Royer, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Mark Davidson, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/10/2002
Re: New Paramaters/New Properties Sections, John Stracke, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Bruce_Kahn, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 09/10/2002
New Paramaters/New Properties Sections, George Babics, 09/10/2002
[Fwd: How To Handle Attachments], George Babics, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, George Babics, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Bruce_Kahn, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Andrea Campi, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Bruce_Kahn, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Bruce_Kahn, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Bruce_Kahn, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Andrea Campi, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Mark Davidson, 09/10/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/09/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/09/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Bruce_Kahn, 09/09/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Bruce_Kahn, 09/09/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Bruce_Kahn, 09/09/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 09/09/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Bruce_Kahn, 09/09/2002
Re: Reply semantics [Was: QUERY * TARGET * METHOD], Doug Royer, 09/06/2002
Re: Reply semantics [Was: QUERY * TARGET * METHOD], Andrea Campi, 09/06/2002
Re: Reply semantics [Was: QUERY * TARGET * METHOD], John Stracke, 09/06/2002
Re: Ordering of results, Doug Royer, 09/06/2002
Re: Ordering of results, Doug Royer, 09/06/2002
Re: Reply semantics [Was: QUERY * TARGET * METHOD], Doug Royer, 09/06/2002
Ordering of results, Andrea Campi, 09/06/2002
Reply semantics [Was: QUERY * TARGET * METHOD], Andrea Campi, 09/06/2002
Re: QUERY * TARGET * METHOD, Doug Royer, 09/05/2002
Re: QUERY * TARGET * METHOD, Andrea Campi, 09/05/2002
Re: DELETED objects, Doug Royer, 09/05/2002
Re: QUERY * TARGET * METHOD, Doug Royer, 09/05/2002
DELETED objects, Andrea Campi, 09/05/2002
Re: QUERY * TARGET * METHOD, Andrea Campi, 09/05/2002
Re: Reply to MODIFY command, Andrea Campi, 09/05/2002
Re: GET-CAPABILITY, Doug Royer, 09/04/2002
Re: Reply to MODIFY command, Doug Royer, 09/04/2002
Re: QUERY * TARGET * METHOD, Doug Royer, 09/04/2002
Re: TARGET in VQUERY (was: No comments on my proposals?), Doug Royer, 09/04/2002
GET-CAPABILITY, Andrea Campi, 09/04/2002
Reply to MODIFY command, Andrea Campi, 09/04/2002
Atomic operations or not, Andrea Campi, 09/04/2002
QUERY * TARGET * METHOD, Andrea Campi, 09/04/2002
Re: TARGET in VQUERY (was: No comments on my proposals?), Andrea Campi, 09/04/2002
Re: CAL-QUERY definition, Mark Davidson, 09/03/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 08/30/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 08/30/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 08/30/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 08/30/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Andrea Campi, 08/30/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 08/30/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 08/30/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Andrea Campi, 08/30/2002
Re: Small correction in GENERATE-UID, Doug Royer, 08/29/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 08/29/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 08/29/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Mark Davidson, 08/29/2002
Small correction in GENERATE-UID, Mark Davidson, 08/29/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 08/29/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 08/28/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 08/28/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 08/28/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 08/28/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 08/28/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 08/28/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 08/28/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 08/28/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Doug Royer, 08/28/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Mark Davidson, 08/28/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Andrea Campi, 08/28/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Mark Davidson, 08/28/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Andrea Campi, 08/28/2002
Re:, Andrea Campi, 08/28/2002
Nomcom call for volunteers, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 08/27/2002
Re:, John Stracke, 08/27/2002
Re:, Doug Royer, 08/27/2002
Re: MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, John Stracke, 08/27/2002
MIME encapsulation of multipart responses, Andrea Campi, 08/27/2002
[no subject], Andrea Campi, 08/27/2002
Re: answer to query for UNPROCESSED, Doug Royer, 08/26/2002
Re: answer to query for UNPROCESSED, Andrea Campi, 08/26/2002
CAP - latest snapshot draft-ietf-calsch-cap-09b, Doug Royer, 08/24/2002
Re: answer to query for UNPROCESSED, Doug Royer, 08/24/2002
Re: Search replies, Doug Royer, 08/24/2002
Re: TARGET in VQUERY (was: No comments on my proposals?), Doug Royer, 08/24/2002
Re: CAL-QUERY definition, Doug Royer, 08/24/2002
Re: Question, John Stracke, 08/08/2002
Re: [Fwd: RE: Application for port-number (1026)], John Stracke, 08/08/2002
answer to query for UNPROCESSED, Andrea Campi, 08/08/2002
CAL-QUERY definition, Mark Davidson, 08/08/2002
Search replies, Mark Davidson, 08/08/2002
TARGET in VQUERY (was: No comments on my proposals?), Patrice Lapierre, 08/07/2002
Re: No comments on my proposals?, Doug Royer, 08/06/2002
Re: No comments on my proposals?, Patrice Lapierre, 08/06/2002
Re: No comments on my proposals?, Andrea Campi, 08/06/2002
Re: No comments on my proposals?, Doug Royer, 08/06/2002
Re: dtend/dtstart date value in sample iCalendar DTD Document (xCal), Gary Frederick, 08/06/2002
Re: dtend/dtstart date value in sample iCalendar DTD Document (xCal), Gary Frederick, 08/06/2002
RE: dtend/dtstart date value in sample iCalendar DTD Document (xCal), Frank.Dawson, 08/06/2002
Re: No comments on my proposals?, PATRICE.LAPIERRE, 08/06/2002
[Fwd: Re: Question about iTIP + VCARs], Doug Royer, 08/05/2002
Re: dtend/dtstart date value in sample iCalendar DTD Document (xCal), Gary Frederick, 08/05/2002
Re: Question about iTIP + VCARs, Bruce_Kahn, 08/05/2002
Re: dtend/dtstart date value in sample iCalendar DTD Document (xCal), Doug Royer, 08/05/2002
Re: dtend/dtstart date value in sample iCalendar DTD Document (xCal), Gary Frederick, 08/05/2002
Re: Question, Bruce_Kahn, 08/05/2002
Re: No comments on my proposals?, Andrea Campi, 08/05/2002
Re: dtend/dtstart date value in sample iCalendar DTD Document (xCal), Doug Royer, 08/05/2002
Re: dtend/dtstart date value in sample iCalendar DTD Document (xCal), Gary Frederick, 08/05/2002
Re: dtend/dtstart date value in sample iCalendar DTD Document (xCal), Gary Frederick, 08/05/2002
Re: VQUERY extension proposal, Doug Royer, 08/05/2002
Re: dtend/dtstart date value in sample iCalendar DTD Document (xCal), Doug Royer, 08/05/2002
Re: Is TARGET mandatory?, Doug Royer, 08/05/2002
Re: No comments on my proposals?, Doug Royer, 08/05/2002
Re: Is TARGET mandatory?, Bernard Desruisseaux, 08/05/2002
dtend/dtstart date value in sample iCalendar DTD Document (xCal), ArentJan Banck, 08/05/2002
VQUERY extension proposal, Andrea Campi, 08/05/2002
CREATEing a meeting, Andrea Campi, 08/05/2002
Re: No comments on my proposals?, Andrea Campi, 08/05/2002
Re: Is TARGET mandatory?, Andrea Campi, 08/05/2002
Re: [Fwd: RE: Application for port-number (1026)], Doug Royer, 08/04/2002
Re: [Fwd: RE: Application for port-number (1026)], andrew davison, 08/04/2002
Re: [Fwd: RE: Application for port-number (1026)], Andrew Davison, 08/04/2002
Re: Is TARGET mandatory?, Doug Royer, 08/04/2002
Re: [Fwd: RE: Application for port-number (1026)], Doug Royer, 08/04/2002
Re: [Fwd: RE: Application for port-number (1026)], pregen, 08/04/2002
Re: [Fwd: RE: Application for port-number (1026)], Andrew Davison, 08/03/2002
Is TARGET mandatory?, Andrea Campi, 08/03/2002
Re: No comments on my proposals?, Doug Royer, 08/02/2002
Re: Question, Andrea Campi, 08/02/2002
Re: Question, John Stracke, 08/02/2002
Re: No comments on my proposals?, Andrea Campi, 08/02/2002
Re: Question, Andrea Campi, 08/02/2002
Re: No comments on my proposals?, Doug Royer, 08/02/2002
No comments on my proposals?, Andrea Campi, 08/02/2002
Re: Question, John Stracke, 08/02/2002
Re: Question, Andrea Campi, 08/02/2002
Re: Question, John Stracke, 08/02/2002
Re: Question, Doug Royer, 08/02/2002
Re: Another dubious example, Doug Royer, 08/02/2002
Re: Question, John Stracke, 08/02/2002
Question, Andrea Campi, 08/01/2002
Another dubious example, Andrea Campi, 08/01/2002
Re: Question about iTIP + VCARs, Doug Royer, 07/30/2002
Re: Question about iTIP + VCARs, Andrea Campi, 07/30/2002
Re: Question about iTIP + VCARs, John Stracke, 07/29/2002
Re: Question about iTIP + VCARs, Doug Royer, 07/29/2002
Question about iTIP + VCARs, Andrea Campi, 07/29/2002
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-many-xcal-02.txt, pregen, 07/29/2002
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-many-xcal-02.txt, Bob Mahoney, 07/29/2002
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-many-xcal-02.txt, Doug Royer, 07/29/2002
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-many-xcal-02.txt, Doug Royer, 07/29/2002
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-many-xcal-02.txt, pregen, 07/29/2002
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-many-xcal-02.txt, John Stracke, 07/29/2002
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-many-xcal-02.txt, Internet-Drafts, 07/29/2002
Re: Apple's "iCal"?, Bertrand Guiheneuf, 07/23/2002
Re: Apple's "iCal"?, Olivier Gutknecht, 07/23/2002
Virtual Interop - September 4-5, pregen, 07/21/2002
Re: CREATE command definition in draft-08, Doug Royer, 07/20/2002
Re: CAP draft typos: bibliography/references, Doug Royer, 07/20/2002
Re: CAL-QUERY definition, Doug Royer, 07/20/2002
Re: Apple's "iCal"?, Bob Mahoney, 07/18/2002
RE: Apple's "iCal"?, Darryl Champagne, 07/18/2002
Re: Apple's "iCal"?, Bruce_Kahn, 07/18/2002
RE: Apple's "iCal"?, Peter Thompson, 07/18/2002
Re: Apple's "iCal"?, ArentJan Banck, 07/18/2002
RE: Apple's "iCal"?, Bob Mahoney, 07/18/2002
RE: Apple's "iCal"?, Darryl Champagne, 07/18/2002
Re: Apple's "iCal"?, John Stracke, 07/18/2002
Re: Text value data type in iCal, Mike Hixson, 07/17/2002
Apple's "iCal"?, Bob Mahoney, 07/17/2002
Re: Text value data type in iCal, John Stracke, 07/17/2002
Re: Text value data type in iCal, Mike Hixson, 07/17/2002
Re: Text value data type in iCal, Bruce_Kahn, 07/17/2002
Re: Text value data type in iCal, John Stracke, 07/17/2002
Re: Text value data type in iCal, Andrea Campi, 07/17/2002
Re: Text value data type in iCal, Mike Hixson, 07/17/2002
Re: CAL-QUERY definition, Andrea Campi, 07/17/2002
Text value data type in iCal, Mike Hixson, 07/17/2002
Re: CAP draft typos: bibliography/references, Doug Royer, 07/16/2002
CAP draft typos: bibliography/references, G. Barnes, 07/16/2002
Re: CAL-QUERY definition, John Stracke, 07/16/2002
Re: CAL-QUERY definition, Doug Royer, 07/16/2002
CAL-QUERY definition, Andrea Campi, 07/16/2002
Re: target property in draft-08, Doug Royer, 07/15/2002
target property in draft-08, Mike Hixson, 07/15/2002
CREATE command definition in draft-08, Mark Davidson, 07/15/2002
Re: QUERY-LEVEL vs CAR-LEVEL, Doug Royer, 07/14/2002
Re: QUERY-LEVEL vs CAR-LEVEL, Andrea Campi, 07/12/2002
Re: QUERY-LEVEL vs CAR-LEVEL, John Stracke, 07/12/2002
QUERY-LEVEL vs CAR-LEVEL, Andrea Campi, 07/12/2002
Re: Examples in latest draft, Andrea Campi, 07/09/2002
Re: Examples in latest draft, Doug Royer, 07/09/2002
Examples in latest draft, Andrea Campi, 07/09/2002
[Fwd: RFC 3283 on Guide to Internet Calendaring], Doug Royer, 07/08/2002
Re: Schudling an event 'asap', Steve Mansour, 07/08/2002
Re: Schudling an event 'asap', Doug Royer, 07/07/2002
Schudling an event 'asap', Paul Sharpe, 07/07/2002
Re: Security considerations in cap-08, Doug Royer, 07/05/2002
Security considerations in cap-08, Mark Davidson, 07/05/2002
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-cap-08.txt, Internet-Drafts, 07/05/2002
Re: CAP draft, pregen, 07/01/2002
Re: CAP draft, Doug Royer, 06/28/2002
Re: CAP draft, George Babics, 06/28/2002
CAP draft, pregen, 06/28/2002
Re: [Fwd: RE: Application for port-number (1026)], pregen, 06/28/2002
Re: [Fwd: RE: Application for port-number (1026)], Doug Royer, 06/27/2002
Re: [Fwd: RE: Application for port-number (1026)], John Stracke, 06/27/2002
[Fwd: RE: Application for port-number (1026)], Doug Royer, 06/27/2002
Re: [Fwd: I did a checkin of CAP], Bernard Desruisseaux, 06/26/2002
Re: [Fwd: I did a checkin of CAP], Mark Davidson, 06/26/2002
Re: [Fwd: Re: I did a checkin of CAP], pregen, 06/24/2002
Re: [Fwd: Re: I did a checkin of CAP], Doug Royer, 06/24/2002
Virtual Interop Testing for iCalendar, iMIP and iTIP, pregen, 06/24/2002
Re: [Fwd: Re: I did a checkin of CAP], pregen, 06/24/2002
[Fwd: Re: I did a checkin of CAP], Doug Royer, 06/24/2002
Re: STATE() is ambiguous and makes querying for METHOD an exception, Doug Royer, 06/23/2002
RE: STATE() is ambiguous and makes querying for METHOD an exception, Darryl Champagne, 06/22/2002
Re: SELECT *.* FROM VAGENDA, Doug Royer, 06/21/2002
Re: STATE() is ambiguous and makes querying for METHOD an exception, Doug Royer, 06/21/2002
Re: iCalendar object MUST include at least one calendar component, Bernard Desruisseaux, 06/20/2002
Re: iCalendar object MUST include at least one calendar component, Doug Royer, 06/20/2002
Re: Focus attempt: Do new properties force a change in VERSION?, Bruce_Kahn, 06/20/2002
Re: iCalendar object MUST include at least one calendar component, Bruce_Kahn, 06/20/2002
"UNPROCESSED", "BOOKED" and "DELETED", Bernard Desruisseaux, 06/20/2002
Re: Reply to a command by a command?, Bernard Desruisseaux, 06/20/2002
Re: iCalendar object MUST include at least one calendar component, John Stracke, 06/20/2002
Re: Reply to a command by a command?, John Stracke, 06/20/2002
CU MUST NOT be able to change decreed VCAR with CAP, Bernard Desruisseaux, 06/20/2002
Adding DECREED:TRUE to VCAR on the fly, Bernard Desruisseaux, 06/20/2002
Reply to a command by a command?, Bernard Desruisseaux, 06/20/2002
iCalendar object MUST include at least one calendar component, Bernard Desruisseaux, 06/20/2002
SELECT *.* FROM VAGENDA, Bernard Desruisseaux, 06/20/2002
STATE() is ambiguous and makes querying for METHOD an exception, Bernard Desruisseaux, 06/20/2002
UPN-FILTER has nothing to do with CAP-QL, Bernard Desruisseaux, 06/20/2002
Re: Focus attempt: Do new properties force a change in VERSION?, David Nusbaum, 06/17/2002
Re: [Fwd: I did a checkin of CAP], pregen, 06/17/2002
Re: TZID conflict, Doug Royer, 06/17/2002
Re: TZID conflict, JP Rosevear, 06/17/2002
Re: TZID conflict, Doug Royer, 06/17/2002
[Fwd: I did a checkin of CAP], Doug Royer, 06/17/2002
Re: Focus attempt: Do new properties force a change in VERSION?, Bruce_Kahn, 06/17/2002
Re: TZID conflict, Bernard Desruisseaux, 06/17/2002
Re: Focus attempt: Do new properties force a change in VERSION?, John Stracke, 06/17/2002
Re: ITIP Clarification, JP Rosevear, 06/17/2002
Re: TZID conflict, JP Rosevear, 06/17/2002
Re: ITIP Clarification, Doug Royer, 06/17/2002
Re: TZID conflict, Bruce_Kahn, 06/17/2002
Re: ITIP Clarification, JP Rosevear, 06/17/2002
Re: Focus attempt: Do new properties force a change in VERSION?, Doug Royer, 06/14/2002
Re: TZID conflict, pregen, 06/14/2002
Re: TZID conflict, pregen, 06/14/2002
Re: Focus attempt: Do new properties force a change in VERSION?, Bruce_Kahn, 06/14/2002
Re: ITIP Clarification, Doug Royer, 06/14/2002
Re: TZID conflict, Bruce_Kahn, 06/14/2002
Re: Focus attempt: Do new properties force a change in VERSION?, Doug Royer, 06/14/2002
Re: ITIP Clarification, Doug Royer, 06/14/2002
Re: Focus attempt: Do new properties force a change in VERSION?, Bruce_Kahn, 06/14/2002
Re: Focus attempt: Do new properties force a change in VERSION?, Bruce_Kahn, 06/14/2002
Re: TZID conflict, Bruce_Kahn, 06/14/2002
Re: TZID conflict, John Stracke, 06/14/2002
Re: ITIP Clarification, Doug Royer, 06/14/2002
Re: ITIP Clarification, JP Rosevear, 06/14/2002
Input from the Referees, Bob Mahoney, 06/14/2002
Re: TZID conflict, Doug Royer, 06/14/2002
Re: TZID conflict, JP Rosevear, 06/14/2002
Re: Focus attempt: Do new properties force a change in VERSION?, John Stracke, 06/14/2002
Re: ITIP Clarification, JP Rosevear, 06/14/2002
Re: TZID conflict, JP Rosevear, 06/14/2002
ITIP Clarification, JP Rosevear, 06/14/2002
TZID conflict, JP Rosevear, 06/14/2002
Focus attempt: Do new properties force a change in VERSION?, Bob Mahoney, 06/13/2002
Re: draft-07 - XML, Alan Davies, 06/13/2002
Re: draft-07 - XML, Doug Royer, 06/13/2002
Re: draft-07 - XML, John Stracke, 06/12/2002
Re: draft-07 - XML, pregen, 06/12/2002
Re: draft-07 - XML, pregen, 06/12/2002
Re: draft-07 - XML, John Stracke, 06/12/2002
Re: draft-07 - XML, John Stracke, 06/12/2002
Re: draft-07 - XML, pregen, 06/12/2002
Re: draft-07 - XML, Bernard Desruisseaux, 06/12/2002
Re: Full proposal for current issue (i.e., Where to store METHOD info), Bernard Desruisseaux, 06/12/2002
Re: Full proposal for current issue (i.e., Where to store METHOD info), pregen, 06/12/2002
Re: draft-07 - XML, pregen, 06/12/2002
Re: draft-07 - XML, Bernard Desruisseaux, 06/12/2002
Re: Full proposal for current issue (i.e., Where to store METHOD info), pregen, 06/12/2002
Re: draft-07 - XML, Doug Royer, 06/12/2002
Full proposal for current issue (i.e., Where to store METHOD info), Bernard Desruisseaux, 06/12/2002
Re: draft-07 - XML, Bernard Desruisseaux, 06/12/2002
Re: draft-07 - XML, Doug Royer, 06/11/2002
Re: draft-07 - XML, Bernard Desruisseaux, 06/11/2002
draft-07 - XML, Mark Davidson, 06/11/2002
To show Busy OR not to show Busy, suchet singh khalsa, 06/03/2002
Re: To show Busy OR not to show Busy, Patrice Lapierre, 06/03/2002
Re: To show Busy OR not to show Busy, Steve Mansour, 06/03/2002
Re: To show Busy OR not to show Busy, Steve Mansour, 06/03/2002
Re: To show Busy OR not to show Busy, Doug Royer, 06/03/2002
Re: Questions to answer for the METHOD issue, Patrice Lapierre, 05/28/2002
Re: Questions to answer for the METHOD issue, Bernard Desruisseaux, 05/28/2002
Re: Questions to answer for the METHOD issue, John Stracke, 05/28/2002
Re: CMD;opt=markfor:DELETE [Was: discussion METHOD], Bernard Desruisseaux, 05/27/2002
Re: Questions to answer for the METHOD issue, Bernard Desruisseaux, 05/27/2002
Re: Questions to answer for the METHOD issue, Bernard Desruisseaux, 05/27/2002
Re: CMD;opt=markfor:DELETE [Was: discussion METHOD], Doug Royer, 05/24/2002
Re: CMD;opt=markfor:DELETE [Was: discussion METHOD], John Stracke, 05/24/2002
Re: CMD;opt=markfor:DELETE [Was: discussion METHOD], Doug Royer, 05/24/2002
Re: CMD;opt=markfor:DELETE [Was: discussion METHOD], John Stracke, 05/24/2002
Re: Questions to answer for the METHOD issue, Doug Royer, 05/24/2002
Re: CMD;opt=markfor:DELETE [Was: discussion METHOD], Doug Royer, 05/24/2002

Page 6 of 14
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.