[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: forced VCAR (was: revised security section)

To: Frank_Dawson@xxxxxxxxx, ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: forced VCAR (was: revised security section)
From: "Paul B. Hill" <pbh@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:33:52 -0500
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-calendar/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-calendar.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-calendar-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx

At 02:12 PM 1/27/2000 -0500, Frank_Dawson@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Is this a CS overriding the request CAR specified by a CUA with it's own default CAR?

If so, I assume that an exception would also be returned to the requesting CUA by the CS.

-- Frank

Yes.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: forced VCAR (was: revised security section)
  - From: David Madeo

References:
- Re: forced VCAR (was: revised security section)
  - From: Frank_Dawson

Prev by Date: REQUESTONLY (was: revised security section)
Next by Date: Re: ACTONBEHALFOF (was: revised security section)
Previous by thread: Re: forced VCAR (was: revised security section)
Next by thread: Re: forced VCAR (was: revised security section)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread