Re: CALSCH Action Items - - Error

[Doug Royer <Doug.Royer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Frank_Dawson@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> Doug:
> The following item belongs as an assignment to the iMIP editors. Yet it
> says "Frank". I don't understand what is meant. Can you clarify?
> 
> I-1 MIME alternate/related                               Frank          ?
>      MUST be supported.
> 
> This was clearly an iMIP related clarification, not an iCalendar one.
> 
> Do all you agree?

An ATTACH can contain a MID or CID URI, so it applies to iCal.
And iCal says that an iCal object is a MIME object. And I think we (WG)
had agreed that ical MUST required it (around Chicago time frame), then
all protocols using iCal MUST support it. Including iMIP and CAP.

As I recall, it was discovered by informal interop testing between
Lotus and Microsoft. And it was seen as a flaw in iCal.

I think we want ALL iCal protocols to be able to understand
multipart/related, multipart/mixed, and multipart/alternate
(all known multipart/* MIME objects).

-Doug