Re: Question for list

[Doug Royer <Doug.Royer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bruce_Kahn@xxxxxxxx wrote:

> Is this a show stopper for now?  Nope.  Is it something that should be
> looked at eventually?  Yes.  We are updating 2445 and 2447 so why not
> 2446??  'Nuf said on this topic and back to work...

We are updating 2445 for two reasons:

	(1) Errors found during interoperability testing.

	(2) New items found as a result of the WG chartered CAP work.
	    It was felt (by the AD's? - Patricia/Bob?) that it
	    would be better when we release CAP to include any
	    changes (not additions) at the same time as item (1) above.

	    Their idea was that it was better to not confuse
	    people by incompatible specs.	   

So we are not adding to iCalendar, nor should we add to iTIP.
Is there a BUG list for iTIP?

I personally do not have a problem with extending the charter for SKiCal
or this new work. It's just currently out of scope if you read
the WG charter.

-Doug