[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RFC 2446 Quickie
In looking at the details of RFC 2446 I noticed what may be either an oversight or at least some inconsistancies in the tables of what properties are allowed in each message type.
In particular, for a VEVENT under nearly all METHODs except REPLY, CANCEL and COUNTER the description for SUMMARY and DESCRIPTION says "Can be null". Is there any reason that for these methods we do NOT allow SUMMARY and/or DESCRIPTION to be null as well??
If not, can the current holder of RFC 244x errata and updates please note this. Im sure there are other inconsistancies like this but Im not focused on them just yet...
Bruce Kahn INet: Bruce_Kahn@xxxxxxxx
Iris Associates Phone: 978.392.5335
Westford, MA, USA 01886 FAX: and nothing but the FAX...
Standard disclaimers apply, even where prohibited by law...