I think we can do this, but I think I need a bit more clarification on just what you'd like to see.
___________________
Patricia Egen Consulting
www.egenconsulting.com
423-875-2652
Doug Royer <Doug.Royer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: owner-ietf-calendar@xxxxxxxxxxxx
07/10/00 11:43 AM
To: ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx
cc: ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Suggestion for Action Items handling
Bruce_Kahn@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> In order to make it easier for folks (new or old hands) to find out
> when/how an Action Item was resolved (or at least where we reached our
> final answer), Id like to suggest that some (Doug??) 'tag' the
> thread/posting as relating to that Action Item. For example, instead of
> wading thru 15 "Re: NOOP" and "Re: NOOP again", etc it to find a
> resolution response, can someone (ie: Doug or the WG cochairs) please
> 'tag' or send a final response to the WG like "W-31 NOOP command:
> Resolution (was Re: Re[2]: NOOP yet again...)"
>
> Even w/the ability to have full text indexing like I do, a FT index is
> usually weighted by score rather than by "most recent first" (otherwise
> its not that great a FT indexer). Does this sound like a good
> suggestion? Who would be willing to take that mantle for now: Doug, Pat,
> Paul???
I would think that a chair would need to do this.
Have you tried sorting the threads by date? I would think that the
last one would be a good bet.