[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: iTIP Common Component Restriction Tables



Yipes!

Well it turns out that METHOD is actually called out explicitly in each of the restriction tables for the methods. But I see no problem in adding the line stating that there can be 0 or 1 method.

Hey wait. Isn't METHOD always present?  Can anyone think of a situation in iTIP where it's not?

-Steve

Bruce_Kahn@xxxxxxxx wrote:

 
In doing some more technical diving on the RFCs I ran across an apparent oversight (gasp!).  In particular, in 3.1 Common Component Restriction Tables I found:

   Component/Property  Presence
  ------------------- ----------------------------------------------
  CALSCALE            0 or 1
  PRODID              1
  VERSION             1       Value MUST be "2.0"
  X-PROPERTY          0+

Of the 4 'root level' properties defined in RFC 2445, 3 are listed along with X-PROPERTY.  It seems we forgot to include METHOD.  Im not sure if this is an oversight or if there were technical reasons for it (I dont recall any) so I would like to add a new line to the table in the update that we are compiling:

   METHOD              0 or 1

Any disagreement?

Bruce
===========================================================================
Bruce Kahn                                INet: Bruce_Kahn@xxxxxxxx
Iris Associates                          Phone: 978.392.5335
Westford, MA, USA 01886                    FAX: and nothing but the FAX...
Standard disclaimers apply, even where prohibited by law...

begin:vcard 
n:Mansour;Steve
tel;work:408-276-4268
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:;Netscape
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:sman@xxxxxxxxxxxx
title:Judge, Jury, and Executioner
fn:Steve Mansour
end:vcard