[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: iTIP Common Component Restriction Tables (vAlarms)

Bruce_Kahn@xxxxxxxx wrote:
...
The restriction table in RFC 2446 needs to be amended to include:

       ATTENDEE        0+

Any disagreement? (It is 0+ instead of 1+ since only EMail alarms have them...)

OK, we can update the valarm table in 3.1 to include:

    ATTENDEE       0+      Can only be present when the ACTION
                           property has the value EMAIL

-Steve
  

begin:vcard 
n:Mansour;Steve
tel;work:408-276-4268
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:;Netscape
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:sman@xxxxxxxxxxxx
title:Judge, Jury, and Executioner
fn:Steve Mansour
end:vcard