[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposed Text for RFC2445 Issue #1



eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Well, it doesn't, since there isn't a problem with FMTYPE. The name of the
> issue is an error. ( I got the wrong Subject: line with the message. I
> should have declared #1 a duplicate of #8, and used the Subject from #8. )

Um.  <dig, dig> OK, well, we had one person post suggesting a filename, last
November, with no explanation why, and it doesn't look like anybody ever
commented; looks like we don't have consensus in favor of this one.

--
/==============================================================\
|John Stracke    | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own.|
|Chief Scientist |=============================================|
|eCal Corp.      |In the long run, there is no middle ground   |
|francis@xxxxxxxx|between justice and genocide.                |
\==============================================================/