[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposed Text for RFC2445 Issue #1
eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Well, it doesn't, since there isn't a problem with FMTYPE. The name of the
> issue is an error. ( I got the wrong Subject: line with the message. I
> should have declared #1 a duplicate of #8, and used the Subject from #8. )
Um. <dig, dig> OK, well, we had one person post suggesting a filename, last
November, with no explanation why, and it doesn't look like anybody ever
commented; looks like we don't have consensus in favor of this one.
--
/==============================================================\
|John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own.|
|Chief Scientist |=============================================|
|eCal Corp. |In the long run, there is no middle ground |
|francis@xxxxxxxx|between justice and genocide. |
\==============================================================/