Re: Proposed Text for RFC2445 Issue #1

[Eric Busboom <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, John Stracke wrote:

> Um.  <dig, dig> OK, well, we had one person post suggesting a filename, last
> November, with no explanation why, and it doesn't look like anybody ever
> commented; looks like we don't have consensus in favor of this one.

Right, but the issue is on the list because there were no comments. If the
request had generated comments and had been rejected, I would have ignored
it. The whole purpose for making a formal proposal for the issue is to
encourage the discussion that did not happen the first time around.

So, do you agree or disgree with the proposal?

eric.