Re: Proposed Text for RFC2445 Issue #1

[Eric Busboom <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, John Stracke wrote:

> More generally, any time we have to introduce rules like this to clear up an ambiguity,
> we can be certain that we're making a mistake.  It is better to make sure that it is not
> possible to construct an ambiguous message.

You're right. I don't really like additional rules either. However, I
still think it is important to keep file names for attached data
consistent between organizers and attendees. If my suggestions will not
get us there, can you suggest something that will?

eric.