Re: IPTEL spec and iCalendar

[John Stracke <francis@xxxxxxxx>]

Patrik Fältström wrote:

> It is extremely important that this is done in a timely fashion. The
> document has passed last call in the IETF, and I as AD was suprised
> that noone from this wg did send in any comments.

Was there a mechanism to tell us that it used iCalendar? Near as I can
tell, it was not mentioned on the calsch list; and I don't think the I-D
announcements mention what specs the draft references.  So, to catch
everything that references iCalendar, we'd have to read all the I-Ds that
come out; I don't think any of us has time for that.

I don't mean to be argumentative; I will go and read it now.  I just
don't think it's surprising that we didn't catch it earlier.

--
/=================================================================\
|John Stracke    | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own.   |
|Chief Scientist |================================================|
|eCal Corp.      |"The Elliot 903 was the first portable I ever   |
|francis@xxxxxxxx|used, though it needed a furniture van to *make*|
|                |it portable." --Will Rose                       |
\=================================================================/