SV: SV: SKiCal component property extension - please

["Greg FitzPatrick" <greg.fitzpatrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

No argument here.  It is just that we are trying to consider each SKiCal
item very carefully ourselves as we submit them here, in that sense we are
reviewing the draft you quote. Once this round is completed we will correct
and deplete and amend before the last call.  For example your EVENT-LANGUAGE
name change suggestion looks like it will be incorporated.

Of course the draft is published hoping for comments, but I hope it will be
easier to focus on the items in the order we introduce them.

Greg




Greg FitzPatrick wrote:

> Please let us introduce one issue at a time and debate the merits of that
> issue.

John wrote:

I'm not sure that's a good process; it winds up being too myopic.  You're
introducing a *lot* of new properties and parameters, which work together;
to
some extent, at least, they need to be considered together.  At a minimum,
the
group needs a guarantee that no decisions will be made on any proposal until
we've discussed all of them, so that, if the discussion of proposal #17
uncovers a problem with proposal #3, we're not already committed to
accepting
#3.

> But then you referenced PROMO, which we had
> not yet submitted

You published it as a Draft, which implies you're looking for comments.

--
/==============================================================\
|John Stracke    | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own.|
|Chief Scientist |=============================================|
|eCal Corp.      |Veni, Vidi, Ridi: I came, I saw, I mocked.   |
|francis@xxxxxxxx|                                             |
\==============================================================/