Re: Extensions To iCalendar

[John Stracke <francis@xxxxxxxx>]

Pär Lannerö wrote:

> > That's why we have the property registration process, defined in section
> > 7.2 of 2445.
>
> Most iCalendar implementations seem to reject any iCalendar object
> containing a property unknown to them.

Then they're broken.  Anybody who writes an iCalendar implementation should
keep in mind the "iana-token" clauses all through the ABNF; since the
implementation can't know what tokens the IANA has registered, it has to ignore
any values that it doesn't understand.

--
/==============================================================\
|John Stracke    | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own.|
|Chief Scientist |=============================================|
|eCal Corp.      |Any sufficiently rigged demo is              |
|francis@xxxxxxxx|indistinguishable from advanced technology.  |
\==============================================================/