Re: SV: SKiCal CONTROL

[Pär Lannerö <par.lannero@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bruce wrote:
> >[The PARTREL property] differs from RELATED-TO since
> >that property defines a relationship between calendar objects describing
> >SKiSources and not between SKiSources themselves.
> 
> Im not groking your definition of a SKiSource compared to the entry 
> represented by, say, a VEVENT in iCalendar.  So the distiction between 
> RELATED-TO and  PARTREL is nonexistant to me.  Can you differentiate it 
> better (at least for me)??

Greg wrote:

                RELATED-TO
descriptor      <------->       descriptor
        |                               |
        |                               |
        v       PARTREL                 v
     event      <------->            event



He could just as well have written:

                RELATED-TO
    VEVENT      <------->           VEVENT
        |                               |
        |                               |
        v       PARTREL                 v
   SKiSource    <------->          SKiSource


Example: a concert (SKiSource) may be part of (PARTREL) a music festival 
(another SKiSource) even though the festival may not even be described 
by any calendar object (VEVENT) existing in the same calendaring system. 
The PARTREL property will be very meaningful anyway, especially if it
has 
a CN-parameter.

               
    VEVENT      
        |                               
        |                               
        v       PARTREL                 
   Concert      <------->          Festival




/Pär



----- Par Lannero ------------ Ny mobiltelefon: 0739-442043 -----
----- par.lannero@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -------- icq:306436 -------------