Anything that will hold up finishing this first draft should be considered "back burner" unless the draft won't work without it. So, I vote for excluding the trust model till the next flavor of the draft.
Patricia Egen Consulting
John Stracke <francis@xxxxxxxx> Sent by: owner-ietf-calendar@xxxxxxxxxxxx
07/17/01 11:28 AM
To: CalSched IETF <ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: CAP - Mutual Trust Model
Steve Mansour wrote:
>One of the issues we need to nail is a question about whether or not
>there is a mutual trust model between CAP servers. My recommendation is
>that we to NOT try to put anything like this in the first pass of CAP.
>First, it will be complicated.
Also risky. I think you're right; we should put it off.
|John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own.|
|Chief Scientist |=============================================|
|eCal Corp. |"The avalanche has already started. It is too|
|francis@xxxxxxxx|late for the pebbles to vote." --Kosh |