[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
CAPABILITY/ITIPVERSION.
To
: "
ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx
" <
ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx
>
Subject
: CAPABILITY/ITIPVERSION.
From
: Doug Royer <
Doug@xxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 15:43:40 -0700
List-archive
: <
http://www.imc.org/ietf-calendar/mail-archive/
>
List-id
: <ietf-calendar.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:ietf-calendar-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe
>
Organization
: INET-Consulting LLC <http://INET-Consulting.com>
Reply-to
: "
ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx
" <
ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx
>
Sender
:
owner-ietf-calendar@xxxxxxxxxxxx
ITIPVERSION - Why is '0' instances allowed? I suggest '1'. -Doug
Follow-Ups
:
Re: CAPABILITY/ITIPVERSION.
From:
Steve Mansour
Prev by Date:
RE: MIME Multiple body parts (Was Re: uid...)
Next by Date:
ALARMID to VALARM after stored?
Previous by thread:
Posts missing/dropped (again)
Next by thread:
Re: CAPABILITY/ITIPVERSION.
Index(es):
Date
Thread