Re: CAP: What is the purpose of CAR-MIN?

[Doug Royer <Doug@xxxxxxxxx>]

Bernard Desruisseaux wrote:
> 
> In my quest to find the purpose of CAR-MIN, I've been
> able to identify the following requirements.  None of
> which requires that a CS should report a different level
> of CAP support.
> 
> As it stands, CAP doesn't need two different values for
> the <car> capability.
> 
> 1- CS MUST implement VCARs for the following predefined
>    CARIDs: READBUSYTIMEINFO, REQUESTONLY, UPDATEPARTSTATUS,
>    and DEFAULTOWNER;
> 
>    Rational: At one point in time people in this WG believed
>              it would make CUA's life easier.

No. It makes small CS's possible.
> 
> 1- Can a CS deny the right to READ the VCARs with the
>    predefined CARIDs?

It could, but that would defeat the point of having
predefined VCARs. Are you proposing a third level:

	CAR-NONE ?

begin:vcard 
n:Royer;Doug
tel;pager:pager@xxxxxxxxx
tel;cell:208-520-4044
tel;fax:866-594-8574
tel;work:866-594-8574
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://Royer.com/People/Doug
org:INET-Consulting LLC <http://INET-Consulting.com
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:Doug@xxxxxxxxx
title:Chief Executive Manager
x-mozilla-cpt:;64
fn:Doug Royer
end:vcard