Re: ITIP Clarification

[JP Rosevear <jpr@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2002-06-17 at 12:39, Doug Royer wrote:
> JP Rosevear wrote:
> 
> > Granted, but this is not something in the scope of the imip or itip spec
> > so there is no standard mechanism for this. Even if there was, when
> > there is no centralized server it is likely beholden to the user to
> > perform this task.  In my mind this is making sent-by not really useable
> > generally for the case of email only scheduling.  There is still no
> > formal mechanism for creating a meeting with, for instance:
> > 
> > ORGANIZER;SENTBY:jpr@xxxxxxxxxx:doug@xxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > And having a copy of the meeting be sent to you for your calendar and
> > then having replies flow to you.  Without that mechanism you may get
> > attendes REPLY messages without knowing what they are for.
> 
> If you are asking if there are applications that do this correctly:
> Yes there are.

How can you judge correctness without a standard?
 
> If you are asking how to do this: You need to write, borrow,
> or buy a mail filter. And your right, this is out of scope
> for RFC244[567] and CAP.

Ok, this is what I thought.

-JP
-- 
--
=======================================================================
JP Rosevear				jpr@xxxxxxxxxx
Ximian Inc.				http://www.ximian.com