[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Diffs - ftp://royer.com/pub/CALSCH/cap.txt
Andrea Campi <a.campi@xxxxxxx> wrote on 10/30/2002
> As Doug said, the default would be 1.0 forever, so there would be
> no ambiguity even with a future CAP revision.
Wow! A key decision making value
that NEVER changes in any version of the protocol. That sounds very
> That said, I agree with you that, as soon as
a new revision is out,
> a CUA would be stuck with a choice of either staying at CAp-VERSION
> 1.0, or implementing GET-CAPABILITY.
> This alone is a reason for me to retire my idea, and thanks for making
> me see the light ;-)
Oh, were it so easy to make others see
For those who are humor-challenged, my responses above were (and still
are) sarcasm and tongue-in-cheek respectively