Re: Diffs - ftp://royer.com/pub/CALSCH/cap.txt

[Bruce_Kahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Andrea Campi <a.campi@xxxxxxx> wrote on 10/30/2002
03:31:51 AM:
> As Doug said, the default would be 1.0 forever, so there would be
> no ambiguity even with a future CAP revision.

Wow!  A key decision making value
that NEVER changes in any version of the protocol.  That sounds very
useful...

> That said, I agree with you that, as soon as
a new revision is out,
> a CUA would be stuck with a choice of either staying at CAp-VERSION
> 1.0, or implementing GET-CAPABILITY.
> This alone is a reason for me to retire my idea, and thanks for making
> me see the light ;-)

Oh, were it so easy to make others see
the light...

Bruce
===========================================================================
Bruce Kahn                  
             INet: Bruce_Kahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For those who are humor-challenged, my responses above were (and still
are) sarcasm and tongue-in-cheek respectively