Re: Expiring of LATENCY

[Bruce_Kahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Doug wrote on 12/06/2002 12:56:16 PM:
> How about:
> 
>    If a CS can start sending the reply to a command
>    prior to the "LATENCY" timeout value, then
the "LATENCY"
>    time has not expired.

Dont forget the text near the top of
10.1.1 that says:

               
                   If
the command is unable to be
   completed in the specified amount of time (as specified by the
   "LATENCY" parameter value), then a "TIMEOUT"
command MUST BE sent on
   the same channel to which there MUST BE a an "ABORT"
or a "CONTINUE"
   command reply.

where it talks about command completion
too...

Bruce
===========================================================================
Bruce Kahn                  
             INet: Bruce_Kahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messaging & Collaboration            
    Phone: 978.399.6496
IBM Software Group                
        FAX: and nothing but the FAX...
Standard disclaimers apply, even where prohibited by law...