[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Expiring of LATENCY
Doug wrote on 12/06/2002 12:56:16 PM:
> How about:
> If a CS can start sending the reply to a command
> prior to the "LATENCY" timeout value, then
> time has not expired.
Dont forget the text near the top of
10.1.1 that says:
the command is unable to be
completed in the specified amount of time (as specified by the
"LATENCY" parameter value), then a "TIMEOUT"
command MUST BE sent on
the same channel to which there MUST BE a an "ABORT"
or a "CONTINUE"
where it talks about command completion
Messaging & Collaboration
IBM Software Group
FAX: and nothing but the FAX...
Standard disclaimers apply, even where prohibited by law...