[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Partial equality match and sort order



sfg wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 08:51, Patrice Lapierre wrote:

On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 15:08, Bruce_Kahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Make that 3 votes for sorting in the client rather than in the CS.
(If my MUA can insertion sort mail that arrives out of order in my
Inbox, why cant my CUA?)



I vote against this.

As do I.

Would the others agree to a SORT capability? Where the default is "NONE"?
Something like:

	SORT:none         -> Any random order.
	SORT:SORT-1       -> As currently in CAP.

This would cause less changes and debate than removing SORT completely
and if we agreed then it is less change to CAP and allow us to
ship CAP sooner?

Comments?

Thanks

--

 Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
 -------------------------------|-----------------------------
 Doug@xxxxxxxxx                 | Office: (208)612-INET
 http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                                |   Cell: (208)520-4044

We Do Standards - You Need Standards

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature