Re: Partial equality match and sort order

[Dan Winship <danw@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 19:27, Doug Royer wrote:
> Would the others agree to a SORT capability? Where the default is "NONE"?
> Something like:
> 
> 	SORT:none         -> Any random order.
> 	SORT:SORT-1       -> As currently in CAP.

But then every client that cared about sorting would need to be able to
do sorting itself in case it was talking to a SORT:none server. And if
it has to have the code to do it sometimes, then why not do it all the
time?

-- Dan