[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Partial equality match and sort order
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 19:27, Doug Royer wrote:
> Would the others agree to a SORT capability? Where the default is "NONE"?
> Something like:
> SORT:none -> Any random order.
> SORT:SORT-1 -> As currently in CAP.
But then every client that cared about sorting would need to be able to
do sorting itself in case it was talking to a SORT:none server. And if
it has to have the code to do it sometimes, then why not do it all the