[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Partial equality match and sort order



Dan Winship wrote:
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 19:27, Doug Royer wrote:

Would the others agree to a SORT capability? Where the default is "NONE"?
Something like:

	SORT:none         -> Any random order.
	SORT:SORT-1       -> As currently in CAP.



But then every client that cared about sorting would need to be able to
do sorting itself in case it was talking to a SORT:none server. And if
it has to have the code to do it sometimes, then why not do it all the
time?


Your correct in that the client will have to do that in order to support
CS that do not, however if SORT:SORT-1 is set, then the client will know
that the CS has sorted the results in locale sort order.


--

 Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
 -------------------------------|-----------------------------
 Doug@xxxxxxxxx                 | Office: (208)612-INET
 http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                                |   Cell: (208)520-4044

We Do Standards - You Need Standards

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature