RE: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT

["Paul B. Hill" <pbh@xxxxxxx>]

OK, we're up to 4. Keep those "votes" coming :)

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-calendar@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-ietf-calendar@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Dan Winship
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 4:58 PM
To: ietf-calendar@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT



On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 14:58, Doug Royer wrote:
> Bruce_Kahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
> > The only reasonble source for keeping the VFREEBUSY accurate is to have
> > it done by the CS as changes are made to the calendar.  _Assuming_ that
> > an unspecified "Bot" mechanism  is the way that it should/would/MAY be
> > done is NOT sufficient here if we want that key functionality in CAP.
> >  CAP 1.0 needs to provide that basic functionality in it or we severly
> > risk loosing user adoption.
>
> Need told me and Pat repeated that we can not add features to CAP
> unless 20 people on this list insist tht it must be done.

Well, I agree with Bruce, so there's 2...

-- Dan