[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT
OK, we're up to 4. Keep those "votes" coming :)
[mailto:owner-ietf-calendar@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Dan Winship
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: CAP & busytime? - not CAP reqirement - CUA-BOT
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 14:58, Doug Royer wrote:
> Bruce_Kahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > The only reasonble source for keeping the VFREEBUSY accurate is to have
> > it done by the CS as changes are made to the calendar. _Assuming_ that
> > an unspecified "Bot" mechanism is the way that it should/would/MAY be
> > done is NOT sufficient here if we want that key functionality in CAP.
> > CAP 1.0 needs to provide that basic functionality in it or we severly
> > risk loosing user adoption.
> Need told me and Pat repeated that we can not add features to CAP
> unless 20 people on this list insist tht it must be done.
Well, I agree with Bruce, so there's 2...