[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RECURRENCE-ID discussion



Michael Fair wrote: 
"Doug Royer" <Doug@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3F3A612E.20005@xxxxxxxxxxxx


Michael Fair wrote:

The only exception is when the Bruces new model is used to invite
you to a single instance and when it is the first object you get
with that UID, then the ATTENDEE has to always do an REFRESH because

they

broke the uniqueness of single instance updates and called it a
new invitation.


First, we didn't break the uniqueness for a single instance. 

Then why did you incorrectly guess if the sample I sent was
an update or a new invite to a single instance?

The correct answer = you can not tell as it breaks the uniqueness
for a single instance.



It doesn't break the uniqueness for a single instance, prove to
me how there is a conflicting copy of UID:1/RID:1 somewhere in
the world different than the one I sent?


Then why did you incorrectly guess if the sample I sent was
an update or a new invite to a single instance?

--

 Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
 -------------------------------|-----------------------------
 Doug@xxxxxxxxx                 | Office: (208)612-INET
 http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                                |   Cell: (208)520-4044

We Do Standards - You Need Standards

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature